![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks for all the comments. Yes, will take bike back to LBS & get
them to check out the front mech. Have about managed to get it working, with only a slight touching on inside face when in lowest gear. However, the height is crap postion - nearly 6mm above outer ring ! The front mech is a 'Nexave Compact' one, so I would have thought that this is suitable for any compact chainset ?? Ideally, I need to front mech cage to be about 3 or 4 mm shorter, then it would clear frame ok. Cant understand if others have upgraded bikes of this era, why this particular Galaxy has such a bad chainline ? I assume it would have originally been a 10 speed setup, as this bike has chromed front forks - think it must be early 1980's model. The person I bought it off had it setup as a single speed bike, so dont know if this would have made a difference. Does anyone know of likely costs in future if I was looking at having it stripped down, relevant cantilever/bottle bosses put on & resprayed ? The frame is basically sound, though its showing its age ! Anywhere I can get suitable Dawes transfers from ? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Pete A wrote:
> Thanks for all the comments. Yes, will take bike back to LBS & get > them to check out the front mech......... > Cant understand if others have upgraded bikes of this era, why this > particular Galaxy has such a bad chainline ? Which way is the chainline out ? If you have the bike in middle rear, and middle front gear, is the front ring too far in or too far out ? > Does anyone know of likely costs in future if I was looking at having > it stripped down, relevant cantilever/bottle bosses put on & resprayed > ? The frame is basically sound, though its showing its age ! Anywhere > I can get suitable Dawes transfers from ? Try one of several bike restorers, adverts often in the CTC magazine or other cycling magazines for quotes. Some will be able to provide close matches to the original Dawes transfers. I had my circa 1990 Nigel Dean restored by Bob Jackson last year. The results are superb. http://gallery9898.fotopic.net/c142382.html The bill came to around £130 including carriage of the frame up and back to Jackson's. The paint finish was single colour, but not the cheapest option, and included fitting transfers. There were also a few braise-on changes (chain hook, extra bottle cage bosses, revised pump peg positions). A friend of mine has had a Galaxy done similarly at Jackson's to a vintage looking design with dark green frame with white sections in the head-tube and seat-tube. If you had a more budget paint job, you may get the whole lot done for under £100. But, you would also need to factor in any extra parts you might need to build up the bike when painted up. Such as the new brakes, brake cables and anything else which you felt was sub-standard on the rebuild (cranks looking scuffed, chainrings a bit old, gear shifters, brake levers, etc. etc.). Even little things add to the cost; handlebar coverings (grab-on in my case) and the chainstay protector (found a carbon-like finish one from M artwhich stays stuck on, unlike the rubberised ones which don't stick to the glue). Given the cost of some quite decent new bikes, such as Dawes from a couple of years ago, advertised at some dealers in magazines, you may find it more economical to get a new bike. Equally one can get a new frame (in more modern material choices) for not much more than my restoration cost. Therefore, unless the old bike has high sentimental value, the conversion/restoration may not be worthwhile. - Nigel -- NC - Webmaster for http://www.2mm.org.uk/ Replies to newsgroup postings to the newsgroup please. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
NC wrote:
> Therefore, unless the old bike has high sentimental value, the > conversion/restoration may not be worthwhile. Thats a very good point. I have priced up getting my tourer refinished at Jacksons and to the standard I'd like, which is nowhere near its original standard would be prohibitively expensive. It has got sentimental value so I'll use it until it falls apart then get a new frame and port as many parts as I can. |
|