Cycling Forums   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage

Go Back   Cycling Forums > General > The Bike Café > uk.rec.cycling
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Proof bottom posting is stupid.

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 20-12.-2004, 09:11 AM   #1
half_pint
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Proof bottom posting is stupid.

If it was normal for the most recent message be at the end of the list
then when you read a newsgroup the oldest message would appear
first and you would have to download the entire list of messages ever
posted to a grooup to get the most recently posted message.
This would take forever and it is obviouly a stupid way to proceed.

But why then do so many people prefer things to be that way?


  Reply With Quote
Old 20-12.-2004, 09:40 AM   #2
Jerry Knight
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Proof bottom posting is stupid.


Troll.

half_pint wrote:
> If it was normal for the most recent message be at the end of the list



Troll.

> then when you read a newsgroup the oldest message would appear



Troll.

> first and you would have to download the entire list of messages ever



Troll.

> posted to a grooup to get the most recently posted message.



Troll.

> This would take forever and it is obviouly a stupid way to proceed.



Troll.

> But why then do so many people prefer things to be that way


Troll.



  Reply With Quote
Old 20-12.-2004, 10:31 AM   #3
Jon Senior
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Proof bottom posting is stupid.

No. You got that all wrong... it should be;

Troll!

[Include full headers here]

Jerry Knight wrote:
> Troll.
>
> half_pint wrote:
>
>>If it was normal for the most recent message be at the end of the list

>
>
>
> Troll.
>
>
>>then when you read a newsgroup the oldest message would appear

>
>
>
> Troll.
>
>
>>first and you would have to download the entire list of messages ever

>
>
>
> Troll.
>
>
>>posted to a grooup to get the most recently posted message.

>
>
>
> Troll.
>
>
>>This would take forever and it is obviouly a stupid way to proceed.

>
>
>
> Troll.
>
>
>>But why then do so many people prefer things to be that way

>
>
> Troll.
>
>
>

  Reply With Quote
Old 21-12.-2004, 04:34 AM   #4
Rich
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Proof bottom posting is stupid.


"half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:32mg27F3nlo2eU1@individual.net...
> If it was normal for the most recent message be at the end of the list
> then when you read a newsgroup the oldest message would appear
> first and you would have to download the entire list of messages ever
> posted to a grooup to get the most recently posted message.
> This would take forever and it is obviouly a stupid way to proceed.
>
> But why then do so many people prefer things to be that way?
>


half-wit would appear to be a compliment.
>



  Reply With Quote
Old 21-12.-2004, 07:56 AM   #5
Tim Woodall
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Proof bottom posting is stupid.

On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 23:11:26 -0000,
half_pint <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote:
> If it was normal for the most recent message be at the end of the list
> then when you read a newsgroup the oldest message would appear
> first

I don't get this? The oldest message does appear first. What sort of
newreader do you use that lists the newest message at the top of the
thread and the older messages below it? Bizarre!

Next you'll be telling me that books should put the first page at the
back. IIRC Japanese does have books that, to westerners, read back to
front but thats related to the way they write. I wouldn't be surprised
if other right to left languages - e.g. arabic - are the same.

Tim.

--
God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = - @B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t,"
and there was light.

http://tjw.hn.org/ http://www.locofungus.btinternet.co.uk/
  Reply With Quote
Old 21-12.-2004, 09:06 AM   #6
half_pint
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Proof bottom posting is stupid.

No, when you download 100 message it is not the first 100
messages posted to the group but the last 100.



"Tim Woodall" <devnull@woodall.me.uk> wrote in message
news:slrncseija.2dq.devnull@feynman.home.woodall.me.uk...
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 23:11:26 -0000,
> half_pint <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > If it was normal for the most recent message be at the end of the list
> > then when you read a newsgroup the oldest message would appear
> > first

> I don't get this? The oldest message does appear first. What sort of
> newreader do you use that lists the newest message at the top of the
> thread and the older messages below it? Bizarre!
>
> Next you'll be telling me that books should put the first page at the
> back. IIRC Japanese does have books that, to westerners, read back to
> front but thats related to the way they write. I wouldn't be surprised
> if other right to left languages - e.g. arabic - are the same.
>
> Tim.
>
> --
> God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = - @B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t,"
> and there was light.
>
> http://tjw.hn.org/ http://www.locofungus.btinternet.co.uk/



  Reply With Quote
Old 23-12.-2004, 06:03 AM   #7
Just zis Guy, you know?
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Proof bottom posting is stupid.


The real proof bottom posting is stupid would probably be if half_wit
started advocating it.

Guy
--
"then came ye chavves, theyre cartes girded wyth candels
blue, and theyre beastes wyth straynge horn-lyke thyngs
onn theyre arses that theyre fartes be herde from myles
around." Chaucer, the Sheppey Tales
  Reply With Quote
Old 23-12.-2004, 06:04 AM   #8
Just zis Guy, you know?
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Proof bottom posting is stupid.

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 23:06:42 -0000, "half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com>
wrote in message <32p45bF3peeehU1@individual.net>:

>No, when you download 100 message it is not the first 100
>messages posted to the group but the last 100.


Or, in my case, all of them in sequence. After 4 days away, just over
400 messages. All of which had downloaded in their entirety by the
time I'd made myself a cup of tea to drink while reading them.

What was your pointless again?

Guy
--
"then came ye chavves, theyre cartes girded wyth candels
blue, and theyre beastes wyth straynge horn-lyke thyngs
onn theyre arses that theyre fartes be herde from myles
around." Chaucer, the Sheppey Tales
  Reply With Quote



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:19 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com