Today's Forum Topics
Set as homepage
|
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
 |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
29-12.-2004, 06:32 AM
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Cyclist died after crash with walker
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 06:50:50 +1100, will24387
<will24387.1hzpny@no-mx.forums.cyclingforums.com> wrote in message <will24387.1hzpny@no-mx.forums.cyclingforums.com>: >any law that could be brought in i think should be. What /any/ law? There are a lot of laws that /could/ be brought in. Some of them do some good, others don't. Most, on the face of it, don't - largely because all the things which really needed to be controlled (like assault and murder and theft) have been illegal since forever, so any new law is very likely to be tinkering at the edges or a knee-jerk reaction to stupid tabloid headlines. I think I would probably vote for any party which made a manifesto commitment to pass no new law without repealing at least one old one, and to ensure that any new law enacted or repealed had pr-defined success criteria, with the enactment or repeal automatically reversed if the criteria are not met. Guy -- "then came ye chavves, theyre cartes girded wyth candels blue, and theyre beastes wyth straynge horn-lyke thyngs onn theyre arses that theyre fartes be herde from myles around." Chaucer, the Sheppey Tales |
|
|
04-01.-2005, 12:08 AM
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Cyclist died after crash with walker
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:32:52 +0000 someone who may be "Just zis Guy,
you know?" <uce@ftc.gov> wrote this:- >I think I would probably vote for any party which made a manifesto >commitment to pass no new law without repealing at least one old one, >and to ensure that any new law enacted or repealed had pr-defined >success criteria, with the enactment or repeal automatically reversed >if the criteria are not met. You would need to think carefully about who measured this. The road "safety" lobby have produced figures for decades that "demonstrate" that their activities are beneficial. -- David Hansen, Edinburgh | PGP email preferred-key number F566DA0E I will always explain revoked keys, unless the UK government prevents me by using the RIP Act 2000. |
|
|
Linear Mode
