![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1
|
Hello,
I have been out of riding for the last 4 + years. I burn't my self out training and doing the California Triple Crown in 2000. Now it is time to get back in shape. I still have my old faithful Klein Pulse converted into a single speed and am using 180mm crank arms with a 34-16 gearing. I ride in a hilly area and this setup worked great for me 4 years ago. Now I just purchased a Specialized Langster singlespeed with 170 cranks and I wondered what crank arm length would work best in the hills? By the way, I will turn 48 next week and I wonder about my knees. The stock 48-16 gearing has been changed to a 48-18 but more torque/leverage would be welcome. Would going to a 172.5 or 175mm crank help my needs? Thanks, Mike |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2
|
I'd say go to 175 for hills. I don't know how tall you are, but the longer the better. I ride a Mercks EX pro single speed and am considering going to 180 mm to east the pain of hills. I also have it at 39-16 which I am changing to 39-18 first. Just the ratio change will save me alot of knee and back pain. Then we'' see if I need to expend the cash for the crank arms.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 387
|
I have a langster too and change gears often, not the cranks as of yet. I have found that a 42x16 seems to be a good gear where you are spinning nicely and doing a decent clip. I'd play with the gears a little more before getting cranks. I am getting a 17 for the fixed side and think 42x17 will be a lot of fun. Good luck.
__________________
-Meek "Some people train to look pretty. I just train so I can be the strongest man there is. And then again, I'm already pretty." -Magnus Samuelsson |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
|
I ride a fixed-wheel on the road with 165 cranks. It feels like riding a bloody circus bike and is hard going on the hills, but I love it. With my bottom bracket height, I could probably go to 175's quite happily, but I don't want to spend any money on it (and there isn't a lot to select from when it comes to track bike parts here in Malaysian Borneo).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: th' ghet-to
Posts: 26
|
Quote:
Obviously, this doesn't apply to everyone: The smaller circles you cover with the shorter cranks are better for your knees, given any gear. Remember that 180mm cranks put your knees 20 mm further up than 170mm*, which combined with the faster angular velocity puts a lot of bad news in a little package. *yes, my maths are just fine here.
__________________
Sorry, English is not your primary language. |
|
|
|
|