Today's Forum Topics
Set as homepage
|
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
 |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
15-04.-2003, 02:38 PM
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 27
|
Good Paris-Roubaix
So, for those who saw it, was it a good Paris-Roubaix?
It looked like the weather was fine, so no rain, no mud... did that spoil it? |
|
|
|
15-04.-2003, 03:36 PM
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Gistel - Belgium
Posts: 112
|
You don't always need mud to have a good P-R.
The race was very exciting 'till the very end and with PVP the best rider of the day won. ... just a shame Musseeuw punctured at the wrong time.  Even a 95% Musseeuw could have been a strong contenderNiek |
|
|
|
|
17-04.-2003, 08:25 PM
|
#3 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Below Australia -20 years
Posts: 1,993
 |
No....mud isn't required for a good Paris Roubaix, I love this photo:
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
