![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
|
I just want to see how good everyone else is. I love biking and race however it seems like my competition is 18 year olds when I am racing, well see thats the problem. Its kinda hard to compare myself to racers 3 or more years older than me. If you guys would like to just say sometimes or have an opinon on the lack of younger riders just speak up!
__________________
I was once asked, "Why do you bike 100 miles in this terrible weather?" and I answered, "What else would I do? Stay at home and watch T.V.!?!?!?!?!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 222
|
Quote:
How do you want people to compare to you? Times, wins, category.....? Im 17 going 18 but was racing when I was 15 so I suppose I can compare in a way. What do you want to know? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
|
I am 15 and I have been racing for a year now. I live in Idaho and there is not a shortage of 15 year old riders. On my team 6 kids are 15 and at state my the 15/16 class was 16 kids. At nationals there was over 50 15-18.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
|
Lol...Racing over here in B grade im racin any1 from 15 to 40. Theres one or two guys my age....us 'youngsters' inprove with every race....lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
|
Wow we got a kid from nationals, very impressive, well anyways I was just wondering like average mph and like climber or sprinter? Personally I am a climber who rides at 25 mph. Thanks for all of your guys feedback
__________________
I was once asked, "Why do you bike 100 miles in this terrible weather?" and I answered, "What else would I do? Stay at home and watch T.V.!?!?!?!?!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 29
|
55min 40km 16years old.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 222
|
Quote:
Im a bit of a mixed bag. I like my climbing but I've got a decent kick as well, probably cos I do track. Nobody really does time trials around here but as a rough guide I did 87k(55miles?) in 2:19 yesterday. Nationals for us (australia) are split into u15, u17,u19,u23 and open. In all age groups there are at least 70 riders. Note that u15 means that you are either turning 13 or 14 in that year so really 15-18 here would easily have 100+. State numbers here are normally around 15 for u15 and u17 but we have a population of less than 500 000. A very high ratio of junior worlds medalists/champions come from here so quality is great even though quantity isnt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
|
I can climb and sprint. We have gear restrictions for anyone below U19 (i think) so sprinting is weird cause you cant switch to the big ring... But they dont really care abot restrictions at club level, just state.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,017
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 222
|
Quote:
5.5m for u13 (43x16?) 6m for u15 (43x15) 6.5m for u17 (43x14) and whatever 52x14 gives you for u19 for those that are interested. Also until this year for u17 and below 30mm rim, min of 28 spokes, clincher only, no aero bars. Now it is any rim as long as its metal, min of 16 spokes, clincher, no aeros. Old system was better as it gave the less well off more of a chance and created a more equal playing field. Might see a downturn in numbers now when the rich kids bring out shamals, k's etc.. Just a bit of useless info for you.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
|
Yeh, now its max of 25mm rim depth and not allowed to be made from compostit materials like carbon and kevlar. but you can use a wheel with 12 spokes min if its on the UCI rupture test list...some more useless info....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,017
|
Quote:
Even with the changes, that's still an awesome rule-wish we had it in America. Especially for tt's. How can someone on non-aero wheels, even with clip-ons, go with someone on a full tt bike with disc wheels and such. And yeah, that's what some people are rollin' on. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 222
|
Quote:
Yeh I feel sorry for you. Saw a picture on cyclingnews (think it was a thread on the track section here too) of I tihnk it was a 13 and under scratch race on the track at your nationals. I think out of about 15 kids there were only two on non zipp or disk style wheels. Gotta be disheartening for a lil tacker just starting to see that or for the kid who cant afford it. In a way its the same when we reach u19 here as we're put in with the seniors. When your only 16 and havent got an arsenal sitting in the cupboard after having restrictions for so long it is quite daunting to see all the zipps and cosmics on the start line even if you know you can cream some of the fellas. Should move down here! Last edited by rayner : 02-03.-2005 at 09:40 PM. Reason: typo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
|
lol, under 13s and just about every1 is on $3000 bikes.
No aero bars are allowed either...or aero tubing for that matter. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 222
|
Quote:
Sorry blue but you've gotta stick to the facts. You're allowed a bike with a maximum tube width of 80mm, as of uci rules. This means you can have a full on time trial bike as long as you've got no aerobars and legal wheels. saw a girl at nationals the other year with full teschner time trial bike without aero wheels and bars but she still had elbow pads so she couldd use her shimano cables as a semi aerobar setup. From memory she came third last! |
|
|
|
|