Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Mountain Bikes > Tech Corner - Mountain Bike
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


I know everyone will be sick of this question but....

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 04-04.-2005, 09:07 PM   #1
Neil_uk
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 8
Default I know everyone will be sick of this question but....

I don't have the knowledge to decide between -

1. Rockhopper 2004 disc: Manitou Axle Plus, 100mm rebound, hydraulic disc, Deore and LX mechs.

2. Merlin Malt 2 2005: 2005 Magura Vidar forks 100mm, hydraulic disc, deore and deore mechs.

3. Giant XTC3 2005: SR Suntour XCP75 80mm travel, w/lockout, hydraulic disc, Deore and sram x9 mechs.

All three bikes cost around £599 and weight 28-30lbs.

I want it for medium distance trail riding, I don't expect to be doing no more that 1-2 foot drops.

For me - £599 is a lot of cash, and I don't want to waste it, any opinions would be appreciate.

Cheers guys.
Neil_uk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04.-2005, 08:06 AM   #2
stevemtbsteve
Registered User
 
stevemtbsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 103
Default Re: I know everyone will be sick of this question but....

this is solely my opinion, £599 is a lot of dosh, but it will secure you a cracking bike 1st I wouldn't go with the giant, the fork is not as good as the others, plus most bike companies now are going for the 100mm travel and this is reflected in frame geometry, so up grading this later could be an issue (the 2003 rockhopper had the 80mm axel, but moved it up for the 04) granted the diff between 80-100mm is not the end of the world, but travels gettin longer.2nd the choice between the merlin and the rockhopper is v. tricky, some people don't like the manitou axels, my friends have them and we've ridden coed-y-brenin, the peaks, the lakes and they manage fine, and are very low maintanance. The vidar forks have thicker stantions, so will be more sturdy, and it's low maintance (i had a quake fork, which is basically the same design, it was top and no fuss). Both frames are light and have good geometry for trail riding, ride them! find out if which fits you best, check the wheel package out see if ones better, and you might get a slightly more attractive finishing kit on the merlin. They are both sound bikes that you can't go wrong with hope this helps, but is just my opinion!
stevemtbsteve is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-04.-2005, 04:47 AM   #3
Andy Rush
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: I know everyone will be sick of this question but....

Hi Neil, I don't know anything about the other bikes but, picking up on Steve's point, check out the spec of the wheels before you buy. I've a Rockhopper 04 Comp disc and it's a great bike to ride however I've just had to fork out for a new rear wheel after only 7 months.
Andy Rush is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-04.-2005, 09:20 PM   #4
Born2bahick
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 49
Default Re: I know everyone will be sick of this question but....

The fork on the giant isn't the best granted but I like everything else about it! Hydros, Sram, Those are words I like to here! You didn't tell us wich one feels the best to you!
Born2bahick is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-04.-2005, 12:11 AM   #5
Johnny Boy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: The Cotswolds, U.K.
Posts: 2
Cool Re: I know everyone will be sick of this question but....

[QUOTE=Neil_uk]I don't have the knowledge to decide between -

Personally, I would go for the Merlin. Deore hubs on 717 rims handbuilt. Nice. Also good finishing kit and service from Merlin is excellent. Hope this helps. You'll be getting a proper bike for £600 instead of a big company frame with some mediocre bits bolted on.
Johnny Boy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-04.-2005, 09:05 PM   #6
jaz
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 72
Default Re: I know everyone will be sick of this question but....

Agreed Merlin are a very good company, I bought my wheels & disk brakes (Hope xc's/Hope Mini Monos/X717) from them in a package deal & apart from them doing me a very good price handbuilt wheels are well worth geting, allthough if your a hard rider I would get a different rim for the back as the 717s are real skinny & dont feel that tuff.
jaz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13-04.-2005, 03:40 AM   #7
probob
Registered User
 
probob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 48
Default Re: I know everyone will be sick of this question but....

come on, its got to be the rockhoper, it can take more abuse than the others, and is a more allround bike than a pure xc one, a bike that can take abuse if you want to give it it.
probob is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:08 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet