Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Other Stuff > Touring and recreational cycling
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Approaches to gearing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 13-04.-2005, 03:40 AM   #1
analogkid333
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 12
Default Approaches to gearing

Greetings fellow tourists:

I considering giving up my half-step gearing system for something that requires less double shifts. I love the half-step because it's a linear system that provides perfectly spaced gearing jumps, but I'm wondering if there's any other approach to gearing that has worked for other riders. I want to avoid lots of duplicate gears and minimize front-end shifts. I'm shooting for a low-20s to high-90s gearing range. Any ideas?

PS-- I still ride 7-speed
analogkid333 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14-04.-2005, 12:43 AM   #2
EmmCeeBee
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: SW Washington, USA
Posts: 52
Default Re: Approaches to gearing

Oh yeah!?!?!? Well, I ride a 6-speed Honest.

This is on a loaded touring bike? I appreciate the beauty and efficiency of half-step gearing, but in my opinion it's not an issue for touring. For time trials or pack riding, you get that extra bit of efficiency in matching cadence to power output, and it's worth it to sweat over gearing designs and double-shift points. For touring, you simply downshift till you find a gear you can maintain for hours on end. Even if you're in a group, riders tend to get spread out because of weight, ability, gears, etc. After all, it's sight-seeing.

Don't get me wrong, gear choices are important, but I'd focus on upper and lower limits (especially lower), not the midrange. I've already labelled myself by admitting to a 6-speed freewheel.... but I haven't yet found a (paved) hill I can't climb, which is really what counts. Others may disagree, it's based on love of the sport. My 6-spd cluster is 14-28, which doesn't give many midrange options, but on tour I just match my speed to the best gear, not the other way around.

That said, I'm rebuilding my bike with 8-speed components before the summer.... But still I only pay attention to the high/low ranges.

-- Mark
EmmCeeBee is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:28 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet