Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Other Stuff > Commuting and Road Safety
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Fender for Rock Shox

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-06.-2005, 08:46 AM   #1
wrench
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 18
Default Fender for Rock Shox

My present commuter(Trek 7300) is about ready for a going over, it is my first 700c ride. It has done well for the past 4 years, but I want to go back to fat 26 inch tires as I like to do some exploring after work and the 700c's just don't cut it. Anyway I also have a Trek 4600 (same as 4500 except with 9 speed SRAM) and I prefer the way it fits me a lot more than the 7300. Does anyone have any experience with those MX looking fenders that can mount on suspension forks. I have full fenders on the 7300 that work great, but the Rock Shox Judy fork has no way to mount regular fenders. I would appreciate any replies.
wrench is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-06.-2005, 01:14 AM   #2
Batesy
Registered User
 
Batesy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wirral, Merseyside, England.
Posts: 97
Default Re: Fender for Rock Shox

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrench
My present commuter(Trek 7300) is about ready for a going over, it is my first 700c ride. It has done well for the past 4 years, but I want to go back to fat 26 inch tires as I like to do some exploring after work and the 700c's just don't cut it. Anyway I also have a Trek 4600 (same as 4500 except with 9 speed SRAM) and I prefer the way it fits me a lot more than the 7300. Does anyone have any experience with those MX looking fenders that can mount on suspension forks. I have full fenders on the 7300 that work great, but the Rock Shox Judy fork has no way to mount regular fenders. I would appreciate any replies.

I have Judy TT's on my hardtail. I use a crud catcher mounted on the downtube of my frame. It has a soft rubber front to allow for impact from the forks compressing. Keeps mud/grit from splashing up. Even if your frame doesn't have bosses for mounting, crud catcher's come with bands to allow quick installation/removal.
__________________
~Dave~______________
Gratia Dei, sum quod sum.
Batesy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-07.-2005, 12:07 AM   #3
FishMan473
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 16
Default Re: Fender for Rock Shox

For commuting, ditch the suspension fork, replace it with a rigid fork to make your bike lighter, more efficient and reduce maintenance needs. If you haven't bought your bike yet then the shop will probably be willing to do this swap for free, or even offer you a discount. If you already have the bike, the fork will only cost you $30-$60. Then install a real fender.
FishMan473 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-07.-2005, 09:41 AM   #4
wrench
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 18
Default Re: Fender for Rock Shox

Quote:
Originally Posted by FishMan473
For commuting, ditch the suspension fork, replace it with a rigid fork to make your bike lighter, more efficient and reduce maintenance needs. If you haven't bought your bike yet then the shop will probably be willing to do this swap for free, or even offer you a discount. If you already have the bike, the fork will only cost you $30-$60. Then install a real fender.

I don't think so. Should I decide to build up a strict commuter, maybe full rigid, but I'm thinking the 4600 might be an everything ride, as I prefer just one bike instead of a bunch. besides, since I weigh in at 190, the weight savings are only negligable, just not that much.
wrench is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 02:55 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet