Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Power Training
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


SRM or Power Tap?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 15-09.-2005, 11:11 AM   #1
luv2ride
Registered User
 
luv2ride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 39
Question SRM or Power Tap?

What do you recommend SRM or Power Tap and why. Or is there another wattage measuring device that you like that I haven't mentioned that you like.
Your Friend in Cycling
alder
__________________
luv2ride is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15-09.-2005, 01:24 PM   #2
RapDaddyo
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,115
Default Re: SRM or Power Tap?

Quote:
Originally Posted by luv2ride
What do you recommend SRM or Power Tap and why. Or is there another wattage measuring device that you like that I haven't mentioned that you like.
Your Friend in Cycling
alder
If you search this forum, you'll find lots of discussion of this topic. To net it out, I think the SRM Pro is the gold standard PM device, but it's pricey and a bit high-maintenance (periodic re-calibration). The PT Pro and SL are almost equally accurate (and certainly sufficiently accurate for 99% of us), but still not cheap. The Polar is a bit less consistent, but is clearly the cheapest alternative. I went with PT SL and I would make the same decision today.
RapDaddyo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15-09.-2005, 09:47 PM   #3
beerco
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 577
Default Re: SRM or Power Tap?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RapDaddyo
If you search this forum, you'll find lots of discussion of this topic. To net it out, I think the SRM Pro is the gold standard PM device, but it's pricey and a bit high-maintenance (periodic re-calibration). The PT Pro and SL are almost equally accurate


Why do you think that the Power Tap products are not as accurate as the SRM pro?
beerco is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15-09.-2005, 10:10 PM   #4
RapDaddyo
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,115
Default Re: SRM or Power Tap?

Quote:
Originally Posted by beerco
Why do you think that the Power Tap products are not as accurate as the SRM pro?
I don't know that the PT products are less accurate, but I do recall that there is a systematic difference in the watts as reported by SRM Pro vs. PT. But, as to accuracy, for normal training and racing purposes I don't think there is a practical advantage of one over the other. I think the differences are a function of where in the drivetrain the power is being measured. I think the SRM Amateur is definitely less accurate because of the number of strain gauges used.
RapDaddyo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15-09.-2005, 10:31 PM   #5
beerco
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 577
Default Re: SRM or Power Tap?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RapDaddyo
I don't know that the PT products are less accurate,


Ah. Your first post makes it seem like you thought they were.
beerco is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15-09.-2005, 10:48 PM   #6
RapDaddyo
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,115
Default Re: SRM or Power Tap?

Quote:
Originally Posted by beerco
Ah. Your first post makes it seem like you thought they were.
Actually, while I can't point to any test data to support this (although there may be such data), my own personal view is that any differences between the SRM Pro and the PT units are not due to accuracy/inaccuracy but rather what is being measured (crank vs. hub). But, as a cyclist I can't come up with a good reason to choose one over the other due to such differences. But, as to the SRM Amateur and Polar units, I think there is a distinct difference in accuracy due to the underlying measurement methodology and technology. In the case of the SRM Amateur, I think 2 strain gauges is clearly a less accurate methodology than 4 strain gauges. In the case of the Polar, I am suspicious about the accuracy of the Polar measurement methodology through the full range of power measurement circumstances (e.g., accelerations, gears, constant vs. variable application of power).
RapDaddyo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15-09.-2005, 11:20 PM   #7
20thfret
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14
Default Re: SRM or Power Tap?

My criteria for choosing Power Meter is consistency. If you measure your CP power useing Power Tap, you should always train with the device.

For example, my PT told me that for CPx, I can produce x watts. When I put together my training plan, I will use that number as a guide to establish my training zone. I will also use the power tap in my training.

That's my $0.02.
20thfret is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:12 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet