![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 110
|
As I'm beginning my 'base period', I'm beginning to do 2 days of TH intervals (2x15-25:00), twice a week (Tues and Thurs), and a mid-tempo ride on the weekend.
However, as I do the mid-tempo ride solo, I've decided to incorporate a small amt of AWC intervals (4-8 minutes total work, once a week), into one of my weekday rides (if I did a group ride, I'd just count a couple of hard, unstructured efforts and call it good). As I have pretty low AWC, I figure I should some some hard efforts so I don't totally de-train this energy system. My question is this: last year I did this same thing, doing 2-4 2 minute efforts at roughly 150% of FTP, resting 15 minutes, then doing my TH intervals. The quality of the ensuing TH intervals seemed to suffer, going back and looking at last year's power data. I did this workout on Tuesday, then Thursday just did 2x20:00--the power on Thursday's intervals was roughly 5% higher--and in quite a few instances (about 30% of the time), I ended up skipping or cutting short Tuesday's intervals. Since my primary focus is building my TH power, would it make more sense to do the shorter, harder intervals AFTER my TH intervals, even though this goes against the often-touted principle of 'shorter intervals first'?? Thanks for any useful input! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,019
|
Quote:
I would say yes, since it sounds like they are more for maintenance than improvement, but why not put them early in one of your weekend rides? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,691
|
Quote:
AWC = Ana- Woe-bic Capacity?? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 110
|
Quote:
Well, I typically end up doing about 4-6 minutes on Saturday as well, so in reality I guess I'm trying to do a little bit at the higher intensity twice a week. Still, that's a good point, and I could probably work some into Sunday's easy ride. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,691
|
Quote:
Personally, I'd do the set of short intervals at the beginning of the mid-tempo ride on the weekend. They're less likely to affect the overall quality of that longer ride than the shorter TH intervals. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 110
|
Quote:
Hmm...I think you're probably right on this one. Thanks for the suggestion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 241
|
Quote:
I believe AWC: Anaerobic Work Capacity (Monod power model) ![]() |
|
|
|
|