Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Cycling Equipment
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


cost of road bike vs. mtb

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-07.-2003, 05:34 PM   #1
cyclotron
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1
Default cost of road bike vs. mtb

I'm looking towards getting a bike, and i was wondering whether a road bike or mtb actually costs more(for the entry level ones). i dont really have that much money to spend on the bike, so perhaps some of you could enlighten me?
i'm actually going to do more of cycling on the roads, but if a mountain bike is significantly cheaper than a road bike, maybe i'd get a mtb instead.
cyclotron is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-07.-2003, 12:19 AM   #2
Chynnae
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 5
Default Re: cost of road bike vs. mtb

Hubby started adventure racing this year, and he wasn't sure how much he'd get into the sport, so he bought an entry level mtb. If you ask serious mtb'ers, they will say you can't get anything decent for < $4K. He refused to spend that kind of money, and got a Marin Bobcat for US$500 back in February 2003. It's fabulous value because it has front suspension, disk brakes, etc. - components that are usually only found on high end bikes. Now you *can* get ones that are a lot cheaper ($200), but I did research on epinions and those cheaper ones are for recreational biking (I woudn't race with them).

I recently bought a ROAD bike for a triathlon. The one the guy originally showed me was ~$700, and it was considered a basic, entry bike. However, if you only want one for recreational use, you may be able to pay less... but I'm not sure how MUCH less.

Chynnae
Chynnae is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-07.-2003, 02:18 AM   #3
rek
Registered User
 
rek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,200
Send a message via ICQ to rek Send a message via MSN to rek
Default

If you consider a "threshold of decent quality" with regards to frames/drivetrains, a decent low-end mountain bike will cost significantly less than a decent low-end road bike.
__________________
Peter
Cannondale Synapse Carbon Scalpel Cyclocross Ultra
rek is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-07.-2003, 06:11 AM   #4
Can
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 47
Default Road vs Mountain

The cost for a new bike seems to be higher for the MTB's just because it takes more material to make them. There are of course going to be exceptions, but, on the average I would say they will cost more. As for the poster who thought that an entry level road bike is 700. That is a price taken totally "out of the blue" the amount of bikes out there for sale are vast! I bought my first road bike for 450 dollars and I have to say, it doesn't matter how much your bike weighs or what names are on it, if it fits and you are stronger you will propell your bike faster. I have personally beat people riding 17,000 dollar custom titanium bikes on my 400 dollar steel touring frame. I wouldn't shy away from one over the other just because of price. Make sure your intended uses for a new bike are realistic, then get a proper fit, and test ride models that correspond in size. Don't nit pick about price as much, there are many deals out there as well, if you spend a few hours online, you will find something =)

Jacob
Can is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-07.-2003, 06:23 AM   #5
Can
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 47
Default Frame material

Steel:
Strong
Comfortable
Requires attention to possible corrosion
Relatively inexpensive
Long lifespan
If it ever breaks, it gives first, so you have some warning


Aluminum:
Lightweight
Cheap
Less chance of corrosion
Much shorter lifespan
No flex, which is good if your a very strong professional, but, is less comfortable which is a more realistic concern for us mortals.

When it breaks (it will during your lifespan) it snaps with no warning, which can be very dangerous.

Titanium:
Super material, has all of the best benefits and none of the drawbacks for a realistic cyclist/racer/commuter.
$$$

Carbon:
Stiff
Light
Fragile with respect to cuts and, ultra violet radiation.
$$$
Can is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:35 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet