Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Regional Cycling Forums > Australia and New Zealand
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


giant vs trek

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 05-12.-2005, 02:48 PM   #1
moommoom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 7
Default giant vs trek

hi

im looking at buying a mountain bike or hybrid bike.

the shops iv looked at stock trek and giant?

any opinions of which is the best brand for bikes out of these two brands?

for mountain bikes and hybrid bikes are these two brands the same for quality and durability or one better than the other?

so which is better for mountain and hybrid bikes?

giant or trek?


thanks
moommoom is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12.-2005, 01:29 PM   #2
531Aussie
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 5,102
Default Re: giant vs trek

I no mountain biker, but you've had no responses, so here's my half-ass effort

I wouldn't imagine there would be any difference in the frames, unless you start to compare suspension systems -- so it would come down to components.....

BUT, i'd get the Trek because 1 in 3 bikes I see out on the road are Giants ..There's just TOO many of them!!!
531Aussie is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12.-2005, 03:25 PM   #3
cyclist2
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Perth:Western Australia
Posts: 140
Default Re: giant vs trek

Quote:
Originally Posted by moommoom
hi

im looking at buying a mountain bike or hybrid bike.

the shops iv looked at stock trek and giant?

any opinions of which is the best brand for bikes out of these two brands?

for mountain bikes and hybrid bikes are these two brands the same for quality and durability or one better than the other?

so which is better for mountain and hybrid bikes?

giant or trek?


thanks
personaly i wouldnt ride a hybride for MTBing becase the centre of gravity is too high for rough terrian, a 26in is great for 'in the bush' riding
cyclist2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-12.-2005, 02:33 PM   #4
AzzaC
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 85
Default Re: giant vs trek

IT depends what you are after. Giant offer more value for your hard earned moula. IMHO though, Trek make a better bike.

If you are after a bike 'for keeps' (i.e. for 5+ years) then pick the bike with the best frame and fork.

HTH
__________________
07 Giant Anthem 0 - lots of mods! XTR, Juicy Ultimates, Mavic Crossmax SLRs and more
05 Specialized Stumpjumper Marathon with Juicy 7's and X0
Surly 1x1 singlespeed
06 Giant TCR1
AzzaC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-12.-2005, 02:52 PM   #5
jamesc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Leeming, Perth, WA
Posts: 40
Default Re: giant vs trek

Quote:
Originally Posted by moommoom
hi

im looking at buying a mountain bike or hybrid bike.

the shops iv looked at stock trek and giant?

any opinions of which is the best brand for bikes out of these two brands?

for mountain bikes and hybrid bikes are these two brands the same for quality and durability or one better than the other?

so which is better for mountain and hybrid bikes?

giant or trek?


thanks


IMHO I reckon the Giant's represent the best value for your money, and I know that Giant at one stage manufactured Trek frames for them. I am not sure if this is still the case.

When they are running out last season's bikes, I reckon the savings are better than can be obtained on a Trek.

I am somewhat bias having owned a Giant hybrid and now a road bike. If you want to go off road get a decent mountain bike with good componentry, such as Deore or above.

James
jamesc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-12.-2005, 04:04 PM   #6
artemidorus
Registered User
 
artemidorus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,179
Default Re: giant vs trek

Trek enjoy a market premium at least in part through being associated with Lance Armstrong. Many of their frames are made in the Giant factory, although they have gone to some lengths to prevent this from becoming widely known.
All Giant frames are made in the place that does the best mass-production frames these days (not Italy or the US, but Taiwan) and I can't remember the last time I heard someone whinge about the quality of a Giant bike. They'll whinge about their ubiquity, of course. People, however, love to whinge about poor quality of Trek bikes; I don't think that such whinging is merited, it may just be because they are more expensive than, but no better than, other mass production brands.
So, in brief: Giant is better value, Trek has slightly better snob value.
Go for fit, frame quality and good looks over brand.
artemidorus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12.-2005, 09:29 AM   #7
Feideaux
Registered User
 
Feideaux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 32
Default Re: giant vs trek

Previous discussion on this forum has suggested that there is little actual difference between the two, seeing as Giant actually manufacture Trek bikes. For more on this topic, see this thread http://www.cyclingforums.com/t29820...ory-taiwan.html.

If you are going to get a 'hybrid,' may I suggest getting one without a suspension fork as
  • at the lower price range it's going to be a piece of crap that will impede the function of the bicycle rather than facilitate it (heavy, rudimentary spring media, stoneage damping, flexy, unresponsive, poor bushings, etc)
  • money not spent on the fork gets spread around the rest of the bike in the form of a better quality groupset, wheelset, controls, frame, etc. In essence, you'll be buying a better bike for less. The same rule applies for disc brakes
  • you'll go faster with a rigid, plus, it's old school and will never need repairing.
Try having a look at the range of Felt and Avanti hybrid ( or commuter ) bikes. They are really nice.

F.
__________________
"The Ventoux, thrusting abundantly skywards, is a god of Evil to whom sacrifice must be paid. A true Moloch, a despot of cyclists, it never pardons the weak and exacts an unjust tribute of suffering." - Roland Barthes
Feideaux is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12.-2005, 09:41 AM   #8
artemidorus
Registered User
 
artemidorus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,179
Default Re: giant vs trek

If you'll be riding only on the road, you should get a flat-bar road bike instead of the things now called hybrids, which, in my opinion, combine the worst of all worlds.
artemidorus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12.-2005, 11:10 AM   #9
Rod_C
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3
Default Re: giant vs trek

I bought a Trek 7200FX hybrid earlier this year and have done around 1500K's on it without any problems.

I looked at the Giants in the same price range and the Trek seemed a better all round package. The Giants seemed to be a more upright "comfort" style.

As mentioned above, if you want to go mountain biking, buy a MTB not a hybrid.
If you are only going to ride on the roads buy a flat bar road bike.

My intended use was a mixture of bike paths (sealed and gravel), rail trails and road so the hybrid fitted my needs. It's faster than a MTB, but can handle more gravel than a road bike.

Of course now that I find I'm bike commuting more, so I may need a flat bar road bike as well .

Rod.
Rod_C is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-12.-2005, 10:35 PM   #10
robalert
Registered User
 
robalert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Eastwood, Sydney, Australia
Posts: 392
Default Re: giant vs trek

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rod_C
I bought a Trek 7200FX hybrid earlier this year and have done around 1500K's on it without any problems.

I looked at the Giants in the same price range and the Trek seemed a better all round package. The Giants seemed to be a more upright "comfort" style.

As mentioned above, if you want to go mountain biking, buy a MTB not a hybrid.
If you are only going to ride on the roads buy a flat bar road bike.

My intended use was a mixture of bike paths (sealed and gravel), rail trails and road so the hybrid fitted my needs. It's faster than a MTB, but can handle more gravel than a road bike.

Of course now that I find I'm bike commuting more, so I may need a flat bar road bike as well .

Rod.

what are you using the bike for?

are you seriously going to go offroad?

trek vs giant... rhetorical question IMO, ppl buy trek for Lance.... also Trek's distribution is controlled by the one and only Clarence St Cyclery
__________________
Rob

www.bikenorth.org.au

'07 Giant OCR Composite 3 - R550s with Michi Prorace2

'06 Giant CRX1

'96 Apollo Himalaya commuter - Rigid Fork, slicks, fully racked

DMR Switchback Reynolds 520- Velocity Cliffhangers, SRAM X-9, Easton bar/stem


DMR Trailstar 2 4130- Mavic117, Dice Whiplash, SCUD DH bars, LX 9spd, DMR Crisis Cranks.

'04 Giant VT3 frame - SOLD
robalert is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:56 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet