Today's Forum Topics
Set as homepage
|
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
 |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
09-07.-2003, 12:36 PM
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 19
|
New bicycle selection and more....
I am shopping for a new road bicycle and would appreciate any advice on selection. I curently own a Reynolds 531 frame (1989 era) and am interested primarily in comfort (double to triple centuries).
It looks like Al is out due to the shock factor. I am considering carbon fiber (Trek 5200/Kestrel Talon). Today I discovered that Litespeed puts out a 'bargain bike' called the Arenberg for around $2200 US with a Ti Frame and Carbon fiber forks. Oh boy. I would appreciate any advice, rants & raves from the road riding community on this subject. Any opinions on components (105, Ultegra, Centaur etc) are certainly welcome. Triple crank is essential. Thanks in advance for any help on this! P.S. Has anyone done the Santa Cruz Mountain Challenge with a 42X24? That is my lowest gear and I'm a bit apprehensive. |
|
|
|
09-07.-2003, 03:11 PM
|
#2 |
|
Community Team
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 780
 |
have a look at some of the aluminium bikes with carbon rear triangles apparently they are nice and comfy
|
|
|
|
|
11-07.-2003, 01:18 PM
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,667
|
I have a Bianchi Carbon which is seriously comfortable. Would also recommend Campag gear but that is a personal thing and depends on what you are used to. However, I like the longevity of Campag.
I don't think a carbon rear triangle does add much comfort to a well-designed bike. Often it is done by the bike makers as it is easier to glue that in rather than do a series of welds. Then it gets marketed as 'new & improved comfort' which is not always accurate. The most important features for comfort are saddle, shorts, frame design and fit, tyres, tyre pressure, wheels, carbon forks, carbon seat post rather than frame material. |
|
|
|
|
15-07.-2003, 03:07 AM
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,498
|
If you don't mind digging a little to find one, you might check out the carbon beam frames that Trek and Zipp made a couple of years ago. Now out of production, due largely to the UCI banning 'non traditional' frame designs for int'l competition, they're reasonably priced on the used market, and you can occasionally find new/never built framesets.
As these are beam frames, they're easier on your butt than a traditional diamond. I've had mine (Trek Y-Foil) on one 75 mile ride, and posterior fatigue was not a problem. The Trek frame in particular is very aerodynamic. Combined with aero wheels (Rolf), it is noticably faster in sprints and downhills than comparably equipped traditional frames. ebay is the most reliable source for these frames, retailers have pretty much sold off their existing stock. But they're one fine ride, and for me, worth the extra fuss. |
|
|
|
Linear Mode
