Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Cycling Equipment
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Bike weights

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10-07.-2003, 01:22 PM   #1
carmender
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4
Angry Bike weights

What is it with bike makers and their paranoia/refusal to provide weights with all the other specs of models in their websites and catalogs ? I'm going for the lightest, best equipped bike I can find in a certain catagory and unless I go to a dealer who is willing to weigh the bike I'm considering I am in the dark as far as making a choice. The only maker who provides weight is KHS on their website.
carmender is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07.-2003, 05:43 AM   #2
rv
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 331
Default

probably because they don't want ill-informed, misguided consumers to purchase frames based solely on weight.
rv is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07.-2003, 06:49 AM   #3
kneighbour
Registered User
 
kneighbour's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 57
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by rv
probably because they don't want ill-informed, misguided consumers to purchase frames based solely on weight.


I had the same problem with the Trek 2300 I just bought. I also wanted a light bike - more for pose value than anything else, I have to honestly admit. Since I currenyl weight 103kg, a few kilos off the bike would make very little difference really.

What I did was try to lift the bike out in front of me (chest high)with one hand - sort of like when I am at the gym. If I could do that easy, then the bike was light enough. Pretty subjective, I know. But even if they provided bike weights, you can be sure it would be for the 54 cm frames, not the 58cm one I am looking at. And probably with different wheels, seat etc. So I am not all that sure how useful it would be - a bit like stereo amp power now - the manufacturers have so twisted the ratings they have become almost meaningless. And you usually can find out the weight of just the frame itself - but then you have to go to the trouble of adding in the groupset, etc. Not really worth it.

And what do you do as soon as you buy the super light bike? You put on a tool bag, spare tube, combo toolkit, computer, water bottle, etc. You add another kilo or so with all that stuff.

I have become that sensitive to this that I have taken the water bottle off- I use a Camelback anyway. I also took the pump off and put it in my Camelback. Even removed the bell.....and most of the toolkit is in the Camelback too...

But I have to admit I do ride better. And the hills are so much easier. I often wonder if it is a mental thing - I THINK the bike is a lot faster than my old one ... so it is.
kneighbour is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:59 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet