![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
|
Hi
I have been looking for a new bike, the bike I'm interested in is a Specialized Tricross. My old bike was a Bianchi Volpe, which was a 58cm. The LBS who has the Tricross only has a 56cm, 61cm. Obviously the 61cm would be too big. I test rode the 56cm, which seemed ok. The guy at the shop said usually cyclocross bikes are sized smaller than the roadbikes, so if one road a 58 roadbike you would get a 56cm, but he also said the tricross isnt a real cyclocross in the traditional sense. I did notice the seatpost was up pretty high, my volpe had no more than fistful of post showing. Is this just a difference between tradional geometry vs semi-compact. I am about 5'11"-6'0", 30inch-31ich inseam. I feel a 57cm would be perfect( which specialized doesnt make), which do you think would be best to do, get smaller or bigger. They dont have a 58 to try out, Id hate to special order one, and find out its too big. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 15
|
Quote:
To get a really optimal fit one should consider a variety of things like inseam, knee to ankle length, torso length and arm length; not just simple height. Personally, I'd look for a shop that uses a structured method for taking various body measurements and matching the results to parts selection (frame size, crank length, stem length and angle, etc.). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 15
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 85
|
I would say that one should never get a bike too small.
Epic seatpost is a sure sign of many aches to come. Yet it is possible to change this. See "Delta Stem Riser" which can increase a bike by one size. And, it is ugly. With the "large" size, equivilent to 58cm traditional, one would then use a stem of about 90mm (previously considered a "normal" size). This compensates well for the longer top tube of the larger frame and this is a much more attractive and lighter weight option. I'm 6 foot tall, and I find "medium" size, or 56cm, to be incredibly painful and somewhat "toy" looking because of the very high seatpost necessary. Yep. Make the order for the 58. ![]()
__________________
Bar end shifters, new internal gear hubs, and "new" performance tires with tread--proof that at least 3 sane people exist.
|
|
|
|