Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Cycling Equipment
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Racing bike geometry history question

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 19-07.-2003, 04:03 AM   #1
Jim_Rogers
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3
Default Racing bike geometry history question

My question is about the history of road racing geometry. I'm curious about how "slack" or "extreme" racing geometries have been over different eras.

Does anyone know what seat angles, head angles, chainstay lengths, bb drops, fork rakes, and wheelbases would have appeared on european road racing bikes from, say, the 30's up to today? What were the trends? Also, I'm curious about frame/fork weights from different eras.

Is it true, for example, that a Tour de France roadracer's bike in 1950 would have relaxed geometry and weight of a touring bike today, or were they more extreme than that? How about the '60's? '70's?

Do "typical" geometries even exist for any time period? Are there any resources for this type of question?

Thanks,

Jim Rogers
Jim_Rogers is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-07.-2003, 09:09 AM   #2
coolworx
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Springfield MA
Posts: 280
Default

While I think that seat tube angle is crucial, don't you think the rest is dictated (mainly) by seat height and stem length/angle?
coolworx is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22-07.-2003, 04:13 AM   #3
Jim_Rogers
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by coolworx
While I think that seat tube angle is crucial, don't you think the rest is dictated (mainly) by seat height and stem length/angle?


Well, I guess that's true for rider position, but I'm talking about the geometry of the bike itself.

Questions like, what was the bottom bracket drop on Coppi's bike when he won the Tour?

What kind of chainstay length did Merckx have in 1969?

How much fork rake did Alfredo Binda have in the old days compared to Super-Mario today?

Questions of that nature is what I'm researching.

Jim
Jim_Rogers is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 04:41 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet