Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Cycling Training
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


trainer - mag or fluid?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 24-08.-2006, 12:00 PM   #1
genedoc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 63
Default trainer - mag or fluid?

Which type is more road like, quieter, or ? Example: CycleOps fluid 2 vs mag
genedoc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-08.-2006, 08:02 AM   #2
genedoc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 63
Default Re: trainer - mag or fluid?

Hey, come on. Inquiring minds need to know.
genedoc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-08.-2006, 08:37 AM   #3
RapDaddyo
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,115
Default Re: trainer - mag or fluid?

The question you haven't asked is the most important question (or at least it would be for me): which trainer can be used to ride high-intensity efforts at a consistent and predictable intensity? The reason this question is important is that if one doesn't have a power meter, a trainer can be used to ride high-intensity efforts at appropriate levels of intensity based on a simple speedometer. For this purpose, I would buy the Kurt Kinetic Road Machine. If one does have a PM, this is less important, but I would still buy this trainer.
RapDaddyo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-08.-2006, 09:37 AM   #4
mark_e_smith
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 28
Default Re: trainer - mag or fluid?

I was thinking rollers but this one sounds more useful...
mark_e_smith is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-08.-2006, 11:34 AM   #5
RobM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 39
Default Re: trainer - mag or fluid?

I have to agree with RD. Not only do I own the Kinetic, but I've been following his notes on LT workouts for a couple of months now - I therefore feel morally obliged to agree with his opinions!! *grin*

Re your original question: anecdotally, the Kinetic is one of the quietest (or should I say least noisy) trainers on the market. The tyre resistance feels realistic; rolling motion is very smooth, especially compared to a rim-drive trainer. I can't provide any advice on rollers - presumably you should be able to try before you buy, in any case.
RobM is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-08.-2006, 11:48 AM   #6
RapDaddyo
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,115
Default Re: trainer - mag or fluid?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobM
I have to agree with RD. Not only do I own the Kinetic, but I've been following his notes on LT workouts for a couple of months now - I therefore feel morally obliged to agree with his opinions!! *grin*
Heads up, Tyson, you've got guys on your wheel!
RapDaddyo is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:56 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet