![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 43
|
For those who have used both panniers and trailers, which did you like best?
Which worked better for you? Thanks for the info!
__________________
Ginny in Denver-ish 05 Specialzed Sirrus Comp |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 86
|
Quote:
There appears to be two camps and no converts. I would never consider a trailer for touring. Junk fills the space you have. If you have no additional space, you will think carefully about carrying around that blow up swimming pool you might use if the weather is good. It's much more Zen to travel minimally. Also, fewer people will point at you and laugh out load. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 2,744
|
Quote:
I've done both and see advantages/disadvantages to both. Panniers are lighter and require more discipline in packing/organization. Trailers are heavier/slower but allow you to throw items in the huge bag and ride off. I am back to steel Tubus racks and Ortlieb panniers. Lighter and more well organized is an advantage to me. Each tour I take out my check list and try to think of items I can get by without.
__________________
David Ornee, Western Springs, IL USA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 86
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: japan
Posts: 252
|
i started off with a trailer on my first tour. i was still in highschool and even dumber than i am now. of course i piled on all sorts of stuff i thought i needed. as soon as i got back from that tour, i sold it.
today i use two panniers and a rack pack or just lash the tent and sleeping pad on the rear rack. light, not particularly bulky, and did i mention light? it might sound like i'm against trailers, but i'm not. it just depends on what kind of tour experience you want, just like camping. do you want to sleep in kind of late, brew up some real coffee, maybe bake up some corn bread, fry up some bacon and settle down by the stream with a good book before breaking camp, or get up and get moving. essentially, i think it comes down to this, and it's not an either/or situation; more like a sliding scale. do you want to enjoy your time on the bike or off the bike? if you just gotta have that extra thick sleeping pad, spacious tent, dutch oven, and don't mind hauling a heavy trailer because you don't mind taking plenty of breaks, that's what you should do. if you want to cover some serious distance, don't want to bust your butt crossing mountains, and don't mind doing without a few creature comforts, stick with the panniers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 76
|
Personally, I'm in favour of the panniers. While a trailer is easier to pack into, it can be a serious pain to tow if you're travelling narrow single-track roads. You're also paying for the extra storage space by giving up flexibility when you're transporting your equipment. With panniers, you can unhook them and toss them along with the bike into a car, bus, train or bicycle box for the plane. The trailer requires more space and becomes another "big thing" to load.
Best of luck with your decision!
__________________
http://europeinphotos.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 43
|
Thanks for the replies.
The DH and I are going around Lake Erie. The DH says that panniers will be the way to go. I'm good either way but I'm kind of afraid that the bike will end up shaky and hard to control. But we'll see, I think we're going to try out both next summer and go for weekenders and see which we like best. Thanks again!
__________________
Ginny in Denver-ish 05 Specialzed Sirrus Comp |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 43 nicholls st broken hill nsw
Posts: 38
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: China
Posts: 57
|
I have always used panniers. I have read several cycle touring journals in which some tourers used panniers and others used trailers. The cyclists I read all were satisfied with their trailers, but quite a few seemed to have recurrent problems with the points where the trailer attacked to the bike.
In my own opinion, and I have never used a trailer, a trailer is more weight and more moving parts to break, and more tires to be punctured. Keeping touring as simple as possible in my way. Add a trailer and you add problems, but like the others said who did use trailers, they performed quite well. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 43 nicholls st broken hill nsw
Posts: 38
|
Quote:
I use a BOB trailer , one wheel, good attachment points on BOB's own skewer. Don't ever buy a trailer with two wheels. the bob followes you exactly. mine has a shock system and is knows as a IBES. never had a puncher in it in all the thousands of kollometers its done, never broken a spoke, never had to regrease the wheel bearings. Sounds like an add for BOB. tai'nt. I treid most other brands and none.repeat, none came within a bulls roar of the BOB. want to know more email me at tmprowse@bigpond.com.au regards terry |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 31
|
What about bike lean with pannier and mounts? Is it harder to have control over your bike with all that weight directly on the bike? Is the effort used to make these corrections greater than the effort to pull the trailer up some killer mountain slopes? And what about added pressure to the wheelset with all the weight on top of the bike?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 43 nicholls st broken hill nsw
Posts: 38
|
Quote:
regards terry ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 31
|
Yeah it would seem easier to me to pull the weight instead of just adding tons of dead weight to your bike.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11
|
I definitely believe it is a matter of weight and what kind of terrain you want to cover. Panniers are brilliant in warm climates where you are not carrying to much on relatively smooth terrain. The trailer, I found most useful when taking rougher trails, where you don't have to balance all this extra weight and you can attach them onto a full suspension bike if you’re after a picnic in the mountains
There are plenty of good replies to help you make up your mind. Good luck |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 79
|
I love using my BOB trailer for groceries, taking tools to work and SHORT trips. My cycling partner hates the BOB, she is lighter and it tends to cause her to lose balance at higher speeds
20 to 40 km. We both agree that for extended trips front and rear panniers are the way to go. We did BC's Arrow lakes with the BOB and took way too much stuff . We did New Zealands South Island with panniers - a great trip . check out my website ....And cars tend to give you a wider berth when the BOB is swinging a nice size flag ![]() |
|
|
|