Today's Forum Topics
Set as homepage
|
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
 |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
28-09.-2006, 05:41 AM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4
|
Why is Kona using Rock Shox instead of Fox for the 2007 Kula line?
Why is Kona using Rock Shox instead of Fox for the 2007 Kula line? Is there any particular reason for the change? Was it a cost issue or quality issue?
Just curious. Thanks. |
|
|
|
28-09.-2006, 03:07 PM
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 82
|
Re: Why is Kona using Rock Shox instead of Fox for the 2007 Kula line?
I havent seen the new Kona line yet...*checks website*...
Now I have. Im not sure you ever get quality issues with Fox but cost is definatly in there. I mean, the lowest model Fox Fork is nearly twice the amount of a Rock Shox Tora. |
|
|
|
|
16-10.-2006, 01:37 AM
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 103
|
Re: Why is Kona using Rock Shox instead of Fox for the 2007 Kula line?
First: weight, The SID is quite a bit lighter than a Float.
Second: Quality, Fox doesn't make the forks like they use to (negative) and Rockshox are the forks they use to be (positive) |
|
|
|
Linear Mode
