Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Other Stuff > Singlespeed
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


cyclocross conversion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 18-10.-2006, 09:54 PM   #1
Fignon le Grand
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 55
Default cyclocross conversion

Hello

Iwant to convert a steal cyclocross frame to siingle speed ideally with a flip flop hub for cog/freewheel. What do I need to start with and will I need to convert a track hub to a wider axel?

Any other tips v welcome
Fignon le Grand is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18-10.-2006, 10:20 PM   #2
alfeng
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,880
Default Re: cyclocross conversion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fignon le Grand
Hello

Iwant to convert a steal cyclocross frame to siingle speed ideally with a flip flop hub for cog/freewheel. What do I need to start with and will I need to convert a track hub to a wider axel?
Since you have a steel frame, you can simply respace the rear triangle to the appropriate 120mm width by squeezing the stays together ... you can do this manually. Just hold the frame from behind, a hand on each stay (rear wheel removed) and gently flex the stays inward about an inch. There will be some rebound. Measure, and repeat as necessary.

FWIW. I reduced the spacing on a steel road frame to 120mm so I could use it with a 3-speed hubbed wheel.

Similarly, I reduced the width on a 135mm steel frame to 130mm, for example, so it would accept regular 130mm rear wheels. I could certainly reduce it to 120mm if that had been the objective. I had to realign the dropouts; however, you don't need to realign the rear dropouts since you won't be using a rear derailleur; but, you may want to ...

There are 135mm solid axle hubs for single speeds, BTW.

You may need a chain tensioner ... some BMX riders prefer to use a HALF-LINK (and, BMX bikes have track-type dropouts!), which you may find to be more satisfactory (if only aesthetically) than a chain tensioner.

Other than the rear spacing OR wider hub, you obviously remove all the extraneous "stuff" ... leave the front brake ... leaving the rear brake is probably a good idea.

You MAY want to figure out what rear cog size & chainring combination you think will work best for you before you buy three-or-four different cogs & chainrings.

You'll need/want shorter chainring bolts if you don't use a chainguard ... again, a common BMX component.
alfeng is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-10.-2006, 01:23 AM   #3
Fignon le Grand
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 55
Default Re: cyclocross conversion

Quote:
Originally Posted by alfeng
Since you have a steel frame, you can simply respace the rear triangle to the appropriate 120mm width by squeezing the stays together ... you can do this manually. Just hold the frame from behind, a hand on each stay (rear wheel removed) and gently flex the stays inward about an inch. There will be some rebound. Measure, and repeat as necessary.

FWIW. I reduced the spacing on a steel road frame to 120mm so I could use it with a 3-speed hubbed wheel.

Similarly, I reduced the width on a 135mm steel frame to 130mm, for example, so it would accept regular 130mm rear wheels. I could certainly reduce it to 120mm if that had been the objective. I had to realign the dropouts; however, you don't need to realign the rear dropouts since you won't be using a rear derailleur; but, you may want to ...

There are 135mm solid axle hubs for single speeds, BTW.

You may need a chain tensioner ... some BMX riders prefer to use a HALF-LINK (and, BMX bikes have track-type dropouts!), which you may find to be more satisfactory (if only aesthetically) than a chain tensioner.

Other than the rear spacing OR wider hub, you obviously remove all the extraneous "stuff" ... leave the front brake ... leaving the rear brake is probably a good idea.

You MAY want to figure out what rear cog size & chainring combination you think will work best for you before you buy three-or-four different cogs & chainrings.

You'll need/want shorter chainring bolts if you don't use a chainguard ... again, a common BMX component.


Thats greats thanks for all the info. The frame is from the early 80s and has nice long almost horizontal drop outs, would I still need to use a tensioner?
Fignon le Grand is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-10.-2006, 02:46 AM   #4
alfeng
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,880
Default Re: cyclocross conversion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fignon le Grand
Thats greats thanks for all the info. The frame is from the early 80s and has nice long almost horizontal drop outs, would I still need to use a tensioner?
You won't need a chain tensioner -- a chain tensioner is the usual KLUGE/(KLUDGE) when a frame has vertical drop outs.

... Basically, you're good-to-go!

BTW. The chainline MAY-or-MAY-NOT be of some concern, depending on the crankset & BB ... ideally, you want the chain to run as close to parallel to the centerline of the bike as possible. Consequently, most people run the single chainring where the inner ring is normally situated ... but, you'll have to just see what works best for your bike.

BTW2. In-a-pinch, if you don't have ready access to BMX/single chainring bolts (and, don't feel like grinding the nut shorter ... kids, don't try this at home! if you aren't real handy & familiar with power tools), then you can mount the barrel nut BACKWARDS, with the "brim" nesting inside the chainring's recess and the barrel facing the frame. Not pretty, but it will work.
alfeng is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-10.-2006, 02:59 AM   #5
alfeng
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,880
Default Re: cyclocross conversion

BTW3. Those in the know say that ACS BMX single-cog freewheels are considered the best-for-the-money ... you can get them at DAN'S COMP (~$17US) http://danscomp.com/ OR eBay.
alfeng is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-10.-2006, 04:13 AM   #6
Fignon le Grand
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 55
Default Re: cyclocross conversion

Quote:
Originally Posted by alfeng
You won't need a chain tensioner -- a chain tensioner is the usual KLUGE/(KLUDGE) when a frame has vertical drop outs.

... Basically, you're good-to-go!

BTW. The chainline MAY-or-MAY-NOT be of some concern, depending on the crankset & BB ... ideally, you want the chain to run as close to parallel to the centerline of the bike as possible. Consequently, most people run the single chainring where the inner ring is normally situated ... but, you'll have to just see what works best for your bike.

BTW2. In-a-pinch, if you don't have ready access to BMX/single chainring bolts (and, don't feel like grinding the nut shorter ... kids, don't try this at home! if you aren't real handy & familiar with power tools), then you can mount the barrel nut BACKWARDS, with the "brim" nesting inside the chainring's recess and the barrel facing the frame. Not pretty, but it will work.

Thank you, Yeah I thought it would be ok, thanks for confirming.
I live in holland and have easy access to lots of track stuff, whats best for the chain line, a converted double chainset or a track chainset? Id quite like an old campag pista version. Also would bending the stays or moving the spacing on a hub be best for chain line? I certainly wont be reversing the barrell nuts BACKWARDS!! But its certainly a resourceful solution. thanks again for all the assistance
Fignon le Grand is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-10.-2006, 08:15 AM   #7
alfeng
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,880
Default Re: cyclocross conversion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fignon le Grand
I live in holland and have easy access to lots of track stuff, whats best for the chain line, a converted double chainset or a track chainset? Id quite like an old campag pista version. Also would bending the stays or moving the spacing on a hub be best for chain line?
Oh, the Pista crank would certainly be the best ... AND, exquisite! It should be perfect ... you just have to be sure to get the correct length spindle (Pista BB cups are NOT well suited for road use ... because they apparently have a slightly enlarged spindle opening through which dirt/etc. can enter the BB shell).

An obvious difference is that the Pista cranks don't have the inner shoulder because the chainring is mounted on a shorter BB spindle (~103mm? ~108mm?) and the ring is mounted in the otherwise outer position ... 144BCD is common, so a 42t chainring is the smallest you can use. There may be other differences ...

You should be able to mount a contemporary/symmetrical(?) 135BCD Centaur crank on a 102mm Record/Chorus BB ...

If you're using an ISIS or Shimano Octalink crank, then you'll probably want the shortest (109mm?) BB ... and, you will probably need to mount the chainring on the inner shoulder of the crankarm.

You do NOT want to change the symmetry of the rear stays because it would preclude being able to use a flip-flop hub ...
alfeng is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21-10.-2006, 01:55 AM   #8
Fignon le Grand
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 55
Red face Re: cyclocross conversion

Quote:
Originally Posted by alfeng
Since you have a steel frame, you can simply respace the rear triangle to the appropriate 120mm width by squeezing the stays together ... you can do this manually. Just hold the frame from behind, a hand on each stay (rear wheel removed) and gently flex the stays inward about an inch. There will be some rebound. Measure, and repeat as necessary.

FWIW. I reduced the spacing on a steel road frame to 120mm so I could use it with a 3-speed hubbed wheel.

Similarly, I reduced the width on a 135mm steel frame to 130mm, for example, so it would accept regular 130mm rear wheels. I could certainly reduce it to 120mm if that had been the objective. I had to realign the dropouts; however, you don't need to realign the rear dropouts since you won't be using a rear derailleur; but, you may want to ...

There are 135mm solid axle hubs for single speeds, BTW.

You may need a chain tensioner ... some BMX riders prefer to use a HALF-LINK (and, BMX bikes have track-type dropouts!), which you may find to be more satisfactory (if only aesthetically) than a chain tensioner.

Other than the rear spacing OR wider hub, you obviously remove all the extraneous "stuff" ... leave the front brake ... leaving the rear brake is probably a good idea.

You MAY want to figure out what rear cog size & chainring combination you think will work best for you before you buy three-or-four different cogs & chainrings.

You'll need/want shorter chainring bolts if you don't use a chainguard ... again, a common BMX component.

Thanks for all the help but here is the question I have no clue about. What r u measuring when people talk of a 42mm chainline?? Many thanks
Fignon le Grand is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 21-10.-2006, 03:00 AM   #9
alfeng
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,880
Default Re: cyclocross conversion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fignon le Grand
Thanks for all the help but here is the question I have no clue about. What r u measuring when people talk of a 42mm chainline?? Many thanks
I believe the 42mm reference is to the chainstay length (the distance between the center of the BB and where the rear axle is theoretically located) ... with a longer stay (~16.5 inches), it will be easier to ensure that the chainline is closer-to-parallel.

The chainline is the angle of the chain when viewed from above vs. the centerline of the bike's frame -- 0º (parallel-to-the-centerline) is ideal for single speed bikes because there is usually nothing to otherwise prevent the chain from being pulled away (vs. deflected by a derailleur) from the teeth on the cogs or chainwheel other than the chain's tension.

I do not know how many degrees off parallel from the centerline that the chainline can be when setting up a single-speed bike before the chain is incapable of staying on the cogs/chainwheel.
alfeng is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 02:12 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet