![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Community Team
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,306
|
HC announced her candidacy for the 2008 Democrat Presidential race.
How will she fare? Will she get the nomination? Would you vote for her? Would you not vote for her? Why would you vote/not vote for her? If she does get the nomination - would America elect her as President?
__________________
.."But finally the last thing I’ll say to the people who don’t believe in cycling, the cynics and the sceptics. I'm sorry for you. I’m sorry that you can’t dream big. [I]I'm sorry you don't believe in miracles. You should believe in these athletes, and you should believe in these people. I'll be a fan of the Tour de France for as long as I live. And there are no secrets" - this is a hard sporting event and hard work wins it - Armstrong 2005 TDF morelike hypocrisy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6
|
I would not vote for her, because even though I always support the Democratic party (I'm generally a left-leaning libertarian), she is an authoritarian Democrat which is the wrong type (you know, like a PETA liberal). She wants to create a politically correct society by censoring and banning things, which just means creating more restrictions which is something the U.S. does NOT need.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
Hilary's strenghts are that she can handle scandal. She has already survived some big ones. The Democratic Party is controlled by a few individuals, all east coast individuals..... The west coast liberals carry no weight in any political desicions of the Democratic Party... Hilary's war chest which is important is bigger then all the other canidates combined. It's also time she will call in favors..... Hilary did a very smart thing in 2004. She did not back Kerry. She almost backed Bush if you examine it closely. She needed a Bush victory, or her career was over....... A victory for Bush was a victory for the Clinton's.... Being a woman will be her weakness.. Is America ready for a woman????? It could be argued that she has been around long enough that the voters do not think of the women issue when they think of her. Then there is the John Edwards issue..... He is the one the Republicans fear. He is electable. However, Hilary will accept nothing but the Presidential nomination. She may be able to destroy Edwards career as she did Al Gores..... Hilary Clinton is not a woman to mess with. She is viewed as backing the war in Iraq..... That could draw some right leaning voters. That is the key to this 2008 election. The Democrats have to pull voters away from the right. Over the next few months we will witness her dismissing Obama back to his frat house, putting distance between her and Howard Dean, and attempting to convince the voters she is middle of the road.Many people try to paint her a social liberal. I have not seen that since the health care issue she has promoted flopped. Now...... The real issue is "How will the Democrats screw up 2008?" They were handed the election in 2004 and lost. They have to put together a Clinton-Edwards united front to win. .
__________________
"I rule my world with a cellphone." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 83
|
Quote:
She should do fine and win the nomination but I think it will be closer than people think. She had to declare she was running now (not like it was that big of a surprise.) because the field is getting crowded. And if she waited too long she would lose out on some delagate votes and campaign fund raising. There are a few things that hurt her. She has played/voted like a moderate more to the center. Pro-War, etc. But to get the nomination she has to move back to the left since the Democrat big wigs want someone as far left as possible. (look at 2004 they picked Kerry the most liberal of the realistic canidates.) Even though there were/are more electable canidates. It is still a long time until the election and alot of dirt can be dug up in that time. She is a senator and every votes she casts will be scrutinized. That is if she shows up for the votes. (Another of Kerry's problems was he was campaigning and missed a majority of his committe meetings and votes in 2004.) She is very polarizing figure like Bush. Either you love her or you hate her. She really does not have much of a persona like her husband. She comes across selfish, cold, uncaring and calculating. These are not qualities most Americans like. Kerry should have won in 04 but he was seen as a pompous, stiff, and bit of an ego maniac so he lost election. She has never really had to campaign. Her two campaigns were a joke she was going to win in NY against anybody except Rudy. He dropped out because of cancer treatment in 2000. She has alot going for her but it will not be that easy. I personally would not vote for her. It depends on who she selects as VP on if she will win in my opnion. If she gets someone who is truly respected, liked and politically middle of the road she wins. If you thought the last couple campaigns had alot of mudslinging just wait. The nomination process will be worst than the actual campaign.
__________________
“Too bad that all the people who really know how to run the country are busy driving taxi cabs and cutting hair.” - George Burns |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Great Smoky Mountains, TN USA
Posts: 6,119
|
No chance for her. It will be a good year for a stong independent to run.
__________________
Whenever I can't get excited about riding I just fantasize about someone else's bike. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |||
|
Registered User
|
Since I lasted posted, I watched her being interviewed. I was wrong, she led off with her health plan idea. That is a very radical idea, a idea which will pull out all the stops of the opponents...
She needs to shake that social liberal idea......... Don't the Democrats get it???? America does not want a liberal. Which leads to your next point.... Quote:
America is middle of the road. It's hard for the Dems to give an image of being "for the worker" when it is actually represented by the east coast rich...... The Republicans run very effective campaigns.. A Republican knows what he stands for. The Democrats have polorizing voter blocks. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"I rule my world with a cellphone." |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Great Smoky Mountains, TN USA
Posts: 6,119
|
If she gets the nomination she will be the best chance for a Republican victory.
__________________
Whenever I can't get excited about riding I just fantasize about someone else's bike. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
Posts: 48
|
originally posted by BottleCage 'If you thought the last couple campaigns had alot of mudslinging just wait. The nomination process will be worst than the actual campaign.[/QUOTE]Surely after White Water and all the mud that was bulldozed onto Bill htere can't be any mud to sling... unless her opponents start making up lies. Oh geewiz, how naive of me, we are talking politics, aren't we?
Originaly posted by Wolfix 'I was wrong, she led off with her health plan idea. That is a very radical idea, a idea which will pull out all the stops of the opponents... She needs to shake that social liberal idea......... Don't the Democrats get it???? America does not want a liberal'. Wouldn't a universal health care system be of benifit to the 'blue coller worker' or have I misunderstood you? |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 83
|
Quote:
It would if we start from scratch and build it properly. But they will put a patch here, throw some money here, etc. They would never publicly say they plan to start from scratch. Do you remember Hillary's stab at healthcare in 1993. Before a Republican controlled congress in 1994. Nothing happened cause the Pharma companies also have Dems. in their pocket too. (Remember Gore going to Africa to talk them out of making their own generic HIV drugs. So the Pharma companies can continue to charge extorsionist prices.) I think the Healthcare is pipe dream but it is one of the only issues right now she can set herself apart from the rest. She has been pushing the mother thing too but it is not very effective since people do not see her as a nuturing mother like figure.
__________________
“Too bad that all the people who really know how to run the country are busy driving taxi cabs and cutting hair.” - George Burns |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 46
|
What happened to General Wesley Clark, is he in the running or not?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
I believe we have something wrong in this country when health care is so expensive. It is our national shame. However, America is a capitolist country. A government controlled health care system would really conflict with capitolism as we see it now. A look at Canada's system is proof of that. A health care system would make it extremely difficult for the average man to have his own business..... It would burden small business. The one thing we have it good in America is the fact owning your small buisness is not out of the question. My Euro friends have told me that America is good for that. Currently now, we have a fairly strong health care system if you are not a large wage earner. The poor have a good system , the rich have a good system, and ther middle class have to pay through the nose. Just as much as the rich, but a much larger percentage of income.... Hilary Clinton will lose the election if she speaks much about that. The people that defend her health care plan are not voters anyway. Then there is Edwards.......
__________________
"I rule my world with a cellphone." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Great Smoky Mountains, TN USA
Posts: 6,119
|
I see Edwards getting the nomination. That is not a wish of mine, just an early prediction.
White male that has decent presentation (He photographs well).
__________________
Whenever I can't get excited about riding I just fantasize about someone else's bike. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 622
|
Hey that's two L's in Hillary...three if you believe some of the rumors.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
Correct... I named my oldest daughter Hilary...... But not after H Clinton......
__________________
"I rule my world with a cellphone." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Community Team
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: at the bar
Posts: 12,306
|
I spelt her name with one "L".
That was the old way of spelling the name, Hilary.
__________________
.."But finally the last thing I’ll say to the people who don’t believe in cycling, the cynics and the sceptics. I'm sorry for you. I’m sorry that you can’t dream big. [I]I'm sorry you don't believe in miracles. You should believe in these athletes, and you should believe in these people. I'll be a fan of the Tour de France for as long as I live. And there are no secrets" - this is a hard sporting event and hard work wins it - Armstrong 2005 TDF morelike hypocrisy. |
|
|
|