![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I need a little advice from the physics guys.
The Nature Valley Grand Prix is part of the National Racing Calendar. It'll include road races in Winona, MN. The pro/elite women and men will race consecutively (i.e. the women will finish before the men start). We'll have criteriums in town while each of the pro/elite races is out in the country. We've allowed a pretty long time cushion betweent the finish of each set of criteriums and the expected return of each pro/elite pack. Still, we'll want to regularly update each packs ETA during the races so that we can adjust the length of the crits if the road racers are going much faster than we're expecting. We'll have spotters on the course who will call in times as the leaders pass and we'd like to use these time points to predict likely finish times (with the assumption that the average speeds will be roughly constant). My problem is that the road race course is not flat. The women will see three one-mile climbs and the men will see four. There is also a lot of false flat. So I'm thinking that our assumption needs to be that average POWER is constant, not average speed. I have no idea how to get average power from speed or to convert this to an ETA. I realize that we'll never be completely accurate, but I think that we can do better than we would if we assumed average speed being constant. Any help? David |
|
|