Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Mountain Bikes > Tech Corner - Mountain Bike
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


fork size questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 05-04.-2007, 01:07 PM   #1
jeremy067390
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5
Default fork size questions

ok my giant fork bottom of the head tube to axel is around 19 inches my cousins mongoss is only like 18 inches. my brothers jr t bomber on his giant is 0ver 20 inches and steers like a chopper (it works, better attack angle it kills bumps) now i can get you guys exact numbers if you want but here is the deal. we have 2 bikes both getting forks my giant and a bm 29er. i assume smaller bikes get smaller forks right? maybe not but i dont want to drastically change the geometry on my giant yukon 21" if anything a tad longer would be ok. same for the 29er. so what is the deal i dont see specs for sizes when shopping for forks. so im wondering of there is such a thing? any help
jeremy067390 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04.-2007, 10:34 PM   #2
Scotty_Dog
Registered User
 
Scotty_Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 749
Default Re: fork size questions

If you want to keep the geometry of the bike as the manufacturer intended, buy a new fork with the same amount of travel as the original fork. For example, comparing your measurements above, I would say the Mongoose fork has the least amount of travel, your Giant has 1" more travel, and your brother's Giant has 2" more travel.

At one end of the spectrum, XC bikes are designed for leaning over the handlebar, and have a steep head tube angle and shorter travel fork.

At the other end of the spectrum, downhill bikes are designed for leaning back, and have a slack head tube angle and longer travel fork.

Putting a downhill (long travel) fork on an XC bike will likely cause it to have bad handling characteristics, and vice versa.

To answer your exact question (I think): For any given bike model, a large sized bike will have the same fork travel as a small sized bike.
__________________
"There is alot of blather here that does not float the hooey barge." boudreaux 11/22/2005

Last edited by Scotty_Dog : 05-04.-2007 at 10:42 PM.
Scotty_Dog is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04.-2007, 12:51 AM   #3
davebee
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Manchester and South London
Posts: 440
Send a message via MSN to davebee
Default Re: fork size questions

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotty_Dog
If you want to keep the geometry of the bike as the manufacturer intended, buy a new fork with the same amount of travel as the original fork. For example, comparing your measurements above, I would say the Mongoose fork has the least amount of travel, your Giant has 1" more travel, and your brother's Giant has 2" more travel.

At one end of the spectrum, XC bikes are designed for leaning over the handlebar, and have a steep head tube angle and shorter travel fork.

At the other end of the spectrum, downhill bikes are designed for leaning back, and have a slack head tube angle and longer travel fork.

Putting a downhill (long travel) fork on an XC bike will likely cause it to have bad handling characteristics, and vice versa.

To answer your exact question (I think): For any given bike model, a large sized bike will have the same fork travel as a small sized bike.


correct. if you look at the geometry of the different frame sizes, the smaller frames have slightly different geometry to accommodate the same fork and retain the same handling characteristics. The changes are only very small though. You can usually get away with going up or down 20mm on the current handling without too much of an adverse effect.
davebee is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-04.-2007, 11:04 AM   #4
AngoXC
Registered User
 
AngoXC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 82
Default Re: fork size questions

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotty_Dog
Putting a downhill (long travel) fork on an XC bike will likely cause it to have bad handling characteristics, and vice versa.

The amount of stress that will put on the headtube...its not advised.
AngoXC is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:01 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet