![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5
|
ok my giant fork bottom of the head tube to axel is around 19 inches my cousins mongoss is only like 18 inches. my brothers jr t bomber on his giant is 0ver 20 inches and steers like a chopper (it works, better attack angle it kills bumps) now i can get you guys exact numbers if you want but here is the deal. we have 2 bikes both getting forks my giant and a bm 29er. i assume smaller bikes get smaller forks right? maybe not but i dont want to drastically change the geometry on my giant yukon 21" if anything a tad longer would be ok. same for the 29er. so what is the deal i dont see specs for sizes when shopping for forks. so im wondering of there is such a thing? any help
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 749
|
If you want to keep the geometry of the bike as the manufacturer intended, buy a new fork with the same amount of travel as the original fork. For example, comparing your measurements above, I would say the Mongoose fork has the least amount of travel, your Giant has 1" more travel, and your brother's Giant has 2" more travel.
At one end of the spectrum, XC bikes are designed for leaning over the handlebar, and have a steep head tube angle and shorter travel fork. At the other end of the spectrum, downhill bikes are designed for leaning back, and have a slack head tube angle and longer travel fork. Putting a downhill (long travel) fork on an XC bike will likely cause it to have bad handling characteristics, and vice versa. To answer your exact question (I think): For any given bike model, a large sized bike will have the same fork travel as a small sized bike.
__________________
"There is alot of blather here that does not float the hooey barge." boudreaux 11/22/2005 Last edited by Scotty_Dog : 05-04.-2007 at 10:42 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
correct. if you look at the geometry of the different frame sizes, the smaller frames have slightly different geometry to accommodate the same fork and retain the same handling characteristics. The changes are only very small though. You can usually get away with going up or down 20mm on the current handling without too much of an adverse effect. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|