![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 47
|
Yesterday, inside again secondary to crummy weather and I couldn't get myself to do any long L4/5 intervals mentally. Ended up doing 1 hour alternating 2 minutes at IF of 0.85 with one minute with IF 1.1. The total ride had an IF of 0.93. My question is how would you classify this ride from a standpoing of expected physiologic benefit? L3 or L4? Is VO2 max worked at all with the harder intervals just being a minute long?
Scott |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,691
|
Quote:
For your indoor ride, I'm guess that NP and AP were nearly the same, right? So, an AP of .93xFTP falls within L4. Keep in mind that the physiological benefits of L3 and L4 are very similar. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 47
|
French,
It's interesting because the ride seemed a lot easier to me than a 0.93 straight up hour would have been. I also feel stronger for some reason after similar efforts. Just thinking out loud. It's good that the ride is an hour of L4. I "wish" it had some L5 adaptations associated with it. I guess that's just "wishful thinking." |
|
|
|