Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Cycling Equipment
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Cross Max XL & SL

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 18-08.-2003, 06:04 PM   #1
DanBB
Junior Member
 
DanBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: England
Posts: 27
Lightbulb Cross Max XL & SL

Hey, how much better is the mavic sl rear wheel than the xl. I know its a little bit lighter, anything else? its quite a bit more money, is it worth it? I need a new rear wheel thats light, is the xl a light enough wheel basically. Going to be used quite a lot on road. Also are disc style rims more aerodymanic, or hardly any difference. Thanx, any help appreciated
DanBB is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19-08.-2003, 03:46 PM   #2
Topmounter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 26
Default

The only difference, other than price, in the SL disc model seems to be about a 140 grams or so lighter for the set.

The disc brake wheels aren't more aero, but the rims can be built for strength without any comprise for maintaining a suitably sized and durable braking surface. Also, without the brake pads wearing on the rim, the rims should in theory last longer, assuming you don't taco the things prior to wearing through the brake surface, especially since with discs, there isn't a constant reminder everytime you hit your brakes that your wheels need a true.

I guess disc-only rims could also be lighter, but any weight savings in the rim is more than offset by the weight of the disc system bits. The standard v-brake SL set is around 200 grams lighter than the disc model.

Discs are nice if you need the breaking power, but they do still come with some compromise over v-brakes (e.g. weight, price, etc.), albeit less and less compromise every year.

Check the reviews at:

http://www.mtbreview.com/reviews/manufacturers/3036/
Topmounter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20-08.-2003, 05:56 PM   #3
DanBB
Junior Member
 
DanBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: England
Posts: 27
Default

Thanx for the information mate it was really useful

I think im going to go for the SL (non disc) wheel i think as i want the lightest version of the wheel. I mainly use my front disc for all the braking, so the rim should last well as im using the v-brake on it very little. Its a shame the disc version looks so much cooler though!!

Thanx again
DanBB is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 02:33 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet