Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Power Training
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Another TSB Question

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 05-05.-2007, 03:46 AM   #1
buckhorn
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29
Default Another TSB Question

For the PMC I have the default values of 42 for CTL and 7 for ATL. I realize TSB is the difference between the two, but I had about 2 weeks off the bike a month ago and was swimming, running more regularly. I did not enter any guestimates for those sports, and currently PMC shows..

TSB -46
ATL 113
CTL 65

Does the default for TSB go back 42 days?

I am assuming the swimming and running would in theory raise the CTL and lower the TSB.

I do not plan much of a taper because I am more set on improving for the year than one race result.

Any thoughts?
buckhorn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05.-2007, 04:17 AM   #2
acoggan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,622
Default Re: Another TSB Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by buckhorn
For the PMC I have the default values of 42 for CTL and 7 for ATL. I realize TSB is the difference between the two, but I had about 2 weeks off the bike a month ago and was swimming, running more regularly. I did not enter any guestimates for those sports, and currently PMC shows..

TSB -46
ATL 113
CTL 65

Does the default for TSB go back 42 days?


I'm not sure I completely understand your question, but hopefully this will answer it: the half-life of an exponential response is equal to the natural log of 2 multiplied by the time constant (or, conversely, the time constant is equal to the half-life divided by the natural log of 2). Thus, when using the default time constants of 42 and 7 d for CTL and ATL, respectively, we're talking about half-lives of ~29 d and ~ 5 d, respectively. IOW, the CTL value primarily reflects what you've done in the past ~3 mo (since three half-lives = 87.5% of the way to plateau), whereas the ATL value primarily reflects what you done in the past ~2 wk. Since TSB is calculated as the difference between the two, it doesn't really have it's own time constant/half-life, but obviously it will track much more closely with ATL than CTL.

Quote:
Originally Posted by buckhorn
I am assuming the swimming and running would in theory raise the CTL and lower the TSB.


That is correct. The only tricky part is in trying to decide how much "credit" (i.e., daily TSS values) to assign to your swimming and running (an issue I faced recently when my wife decided to stop running and start riding again). On the one hand, there would be only limited crossover in terms of fitness/performance (due to the specificity principle), which would tend to lead you to discount such training (i.e., assign lower values). OTOH, running at least is going to cause more muscle fatigue/damage than cycling, which would tend to lead you to give more credit. It's a tough call...
acoggan is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:57 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet