Today's Forum Topics
Set as homepage
|
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
 |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
20-06.-2007, 08:46 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 7
|
Powertap SL or SL2.4?
I am investing in a PT, I wanted the wireless one because it would obviously look neater but is it as reliable as a wired unit?
|
|
|
|
20-06.-2007, 09:21 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 126
|
Re: Powertap SL or SL2.4?
Quote:
According to SARIS, as of this month the SL 2.4's should be more reliable, as they have nailed the problem that was causing data drops in a few units. The new hubs, which are hard to get now (back order situation), should have a more reliable antenna... While others may still suggest going wired, I have decided to take the plunge (finally) and have ordered a wireless one with Bontrager Aeolus 5.0 wheel. They are in stock @ Trek, so I should get one soon ! |
|
|
|
|
|
21-06.-2007, 12:27 AM
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 15
|
Re: Powertap SL or SL2.4?
Quote:
the 2.4 is very easy and cheap to install on multiple bikes, and it's great not to have wires. I've even lend the unti to another biker and set-up only takes the time to swap wheels and strapping on the computer mount- a couple minutes total. I say go for the 2.4. |
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
