Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Other Stuff > Your Bloody Soap Box
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


@#$!@$# the LBS.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 01-08.-2007, 02:55 PM   #1
spasticteapot
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 30
Default @#$!@$# the LBS.

I really, really, really hate Budget Bikes.


I am not going to spend $500 on a Peugot that's older than I am, and nearly as heavy. I don't want their pitiful excuse for service (one free tune-up in the first, what, 90 days you own it?), and I don't want your insane prices.

For some strange reason (Budget Bikes certianly might not be helping), used bikes around here come in three flavors: lousy (sub-divided into "ancient" and "just plain cheap"), overpriced, and so far out of my price range that I can't afford them anyway.

I've been to some of the smaller bike shops in town, and while I intend to go to them for service, there's no way in hell I'm paying what they ask for a bicycle. $2,500 for something I use to pedal around town is simply too much.

I am not one of the snooty elitist asshole cyclists or "I make $150 an hour - just show me something expensive!" doctors who seem to make up half of the customers at my LBS, nor the "I want something with mad spinnerz, yo!" or "I'm too stupid to use a shift knob!" group that make up the other half. I don't want an all-carbon-fiber unobtanium-bearing magic-hamster frame, nor do I want the bicycle equivalent of, say, an AMC Gremlin.
spasticteapot is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-08.-2007, 03:03 PM   #2
gclark8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Perth (Basso), West Australia
Posts: 3,512
Default Re: @#$!@$# the LBS.

How about some Classic Aussie Steel, for just the price of the parts: http://www.cyclingforums.com/t403611.html
__________________
Cheers,
George.
gclark8 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-08.-2007, 09:10 PM   #3
Scotty_Dog
Registered User
 
Scotty_Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 771
Default Re: @#$!@$# the LBS.

Sounds like you're in need of a bargain. If you have some knowledge base about bicycle quality, check Ebay for used bikes. For new, go here: http://www.bikesdirect.com/
__________________
"There is alot of blather here that does not float the hooey barge." boudreaux 11/22/2005
Scotty_Dog is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-08.-2007, 12:55 AM   #4
spasticteapot
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 30
Default Re: @#$!@$# the LBS.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scotty_Dog
Sounds like you're in need of a bargain. If you have some knowledge base about bicycle quality, check Ebay for used bikes. For new, go here: http://www.bikesdirect.com/
Bikesdirect DOES look good - it's where I was hoping to order my bike from, actually. A bottom-of-the-line Trek road bike will run me $650 from the LBS, while a nearly identical Windsor Dover will run me $360. (Shipping is only $40, and I think I even get to dodge sales tax - which cuts another $35 off the cost of the Trek.)

Also, I personally would like to explain to Trek that their paint schemes are generally garish and stupid. I would like my frame in a nice red, orange, or black - I don't really feel like being a walking banner for the Discovery Channel.
spasticteapot is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 16-08.-2007, 08:31 AM   #5
bkaapcke
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 114
Default Re: @#$!@$# the LBS.

One of the interesting side effects of "offshoring" bike manufacturing is that a well engineered and made bike gets more expensive. The economies of scale just aren't there when you build for a limited market. And, unfortunately, the cost of 'real' stuff really is going up. C'est la vie. bk
bkaapcke is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 16-08.-2007, 09:33 AM   #6
spasticteapot
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 30
Default Re: @#$!@$# the LBS.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bkaapcke
One of the interesting side effects of "offshoring" bike manufacturing is that a well engineered and made bike gets more expensive. The economies of scale just aren't there when you build for a limited market. And, unfortunately, the cost of 'real' stuff really is going up. C'est la vie. bk
That's absolute BS. Offshoring manufacture does nothing for quality - or so says the plant manager for the GE Medical plant in China that makes MRI parts. There are millions of highly-skilled Chinese engineers every bit as good as those educated at many American schools, and tens of millions of highly-skilled workers performing tasks on production lines far more complex than assembling a simple bicycle.

Instead, it's demographics that killed high-quality bicycles. Due to the high cost of manufacturing in the US, making a low-quality bicycle was not much cheaper than a high-quality bicycle, so cheap bicycles simply were not availible. (Remember, once you factor for inflation, a $300 bike in 1980 would cost over $1,000 today.)

Once cheap bicycles became a possibility due to cheap Chinese manufacturing, the majority of the public - who do not appreciate the differences between a good bike and a bad one - bought them. Mountian bikes, which can be easily made out of great lumps of cheap steel, became popular, and as the demand for high-quality bicycles increased, so did the price.

Of course, the difference in price is not that big. Once you factor inflation, a bottom-rung road bike (not quite as nice as today's Schwinn Circuit) in 1992 costs about as much as a bottom-rung road bike today.

Finally, I'd like to comment on my bicycle - a Windsor Sora. It's not perfect, and I'm not entirely sure that the Schwinn might not have been the better choice. However, aside from some low-quality tires (big whoop) and a less-than-great crankset (for $360, what do you expect?), it's a pretty darn nice bike. Once I replace the crankset with something a bit nicer (likely a used Tiagra or Ultrega), it will be really very nearly as good as a $650 Trek - just at 2/3 the price.
spasticteapot is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24-08.-2007, 07:30 AM   #7
bkaapcke
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 114
Default Re: @#$!@$# the LBS.

Sounds like you're not going to be happy at all. Bikes cost money. $500.00 is a small notch above entry level. You can do really well for $1,000.00, if you don't mind doing some upgrades down the road. It's just the way it is. If you like "sweet equipment", you have only a small financial problem. Get over it. Be glas you aren't talking about buying a boat. bk
bkaapcke is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-08.-2007, 05:03 AM   #8
cheapie
Registered User
 
cheapie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 849
Default Re: @#$!@$# the LBS.

so only "snooty elitist a$$hole cyclists" enjoy and appreciate nice bikes?
cheapie is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:22 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet