Friel - Making fall and winter training program

Andy SG

Since January this year I follow a training plan that is more or less taken out of 'The Cyclist's Training Bible'. It has worked reasonably well for me. Looking into planning my training for the fall and winter I get a bit lost, however.

When I ride in groups, be training or race, my problem is that I hit the LT first of all, and start to get acid, when the tempo increase.

If we have head wind, and I can ride a bit protected in the pack, I don't have any problems with the lasting the distance, and there might be other riders that fall out before me. The last year's endurance training has even improved this ability further, and now days I can run for almost 2 hours without eating bars, drinking sports drink etc. I have interpreted this as my Endurance, as defined by Friel, has improved.

If we run in a group and have to fill a gap to other riders I can take the lead in the pack and I leave other riders behind, so when I ride with a pulse above LT I perform as I would expect with my level of training. I have interpretated this as my Force, Muscular Endurance, and maybe even Anaerobic Endurance, has improved following Friel.

So planning for the rest of the year I would like to target my ability to genrate more power below the LT. I have LT at 158, and say I would like to improve power from 120 to 158. Is this endurance targeted by Endurance training, should I add intervalls during the fall and winter?

As I understand 'The Cyclist's Training Bible' Endurance training will of course improve my performace levels, but it is not necessary the best way, or? If I add intervalls, or TT simulations during fall and winter I start to deviate from the periodization approach, but I feel that that would better target my goal.

Anyone that can help me straight this out?

sidewind

For increasing the power on the LT, and on the HR range of 120-160, I'd suppose the classic way would be 2*20 min intervals close to your LT power (which might be different from the HR). Or alternatively or additionally, longer 1-3 hour rides where your HR is on the range, or power would be ~80...90 % of your LT power.

I have also switched from Friel's periodisation concepts (easy winter, harder on spring and summer) to making 2*20...30 min intervals in the winter on the trainer or in the gym, and on spring and summer added 5 min intervals for VO2max, and longer 1-4 hour tempo/endurance rides when it's possible to ride on the road. But I'm not racing; although I see my LT (FTP) power and endurance/tempo speeds have improved (now I can even ride 30 km/h alone on the road, previous years some 26-27 km/h was already a good speed...), I really haven't targeted for specific peak for the season.

__________________
These are layman's opinions, expressed in language no self-respecting scientist woul be using.

Bailsibub

Andy,

Friel uses a pretty old-school system of periodization, in which one works his or her way up to the build phase and then doing anaerobic intervals. This is based on the also old-school principal that you will ruin the base you build if you go too hard, somehow ruining the capillaries.... I don't think this was ever proven by research by the way....

I would recommend other resources for DIY periodization. I have found that reverse periodization works pretty well. You might want to do a search on Dave Morris.

daveryanwyoming

Don't let Friel's version of periodization keep you from training what you need to train. I used a traditional early season base build approach like Friel's for years with lousy results. Last year I redefined base as SST and L4 work, similar to the TT simulations you mention. These aren't easy spinning and they're typically in blocks of 20 to 45 minutes depending on intensity. My sustainable power came up quite a bit over the winter and my racing has never been better. When spring came I added higher end work prior to the racing season and it built very nicely on that base.

There's a lot about Friel's approach to periodization that I no longer agree with but you don't have to undertrain in the early season on the basis of tradition and you have to don't take forced preplanned rest weeks, listen to your body and use something like the TRIMPS model or the Performance Manager in WKO+ to help you plan your training, rest and peaking.

-Dave
P.S. And don't do 2 hour rides without eating just because you can. You'll burn through most or all of the glycogen stored in your muscles and liver and even if you don't bonk on the ride you're setting yourself up for problems on subsequent days. Eat even on short rides to help keep your blood sugar stable and to decrease recovery time.

Strumpetto

Always eat. I did a 60 mile ride without eating (ran out of water for the last 30 miles, too), and towards the end I was about to faint. It's not good news. The squirrels crossing the road looked appetizing.

__________________
Riding Blog

Motobecane Forum

ric_stern/RST

Not only is it not proven by research, it's actually arse about face. That is, capillary density is increased with higher intensity training (e.g., ~zone 5 in the RST training schema or level 5 in Andy Coggan's schema), rather than they blow up, or ruin the capillaries.

ric

__________________
http://www.cyclecoach.com

no1kung1

I am also drawing up my annual training plan for next year using Friel's book. And Base 1, 2 and 3 periods all are essentially long "aerobic" (zone 1-3) rides with some tempo thrown in during base 2 and 3. How would you specifically reccomend altering these periods?

kant314

I never found Friel's ideas particularly easy to follow or particularly well set out, either.
I don't think you can go far wrong with hitting the 2x20's over the autumn/winter with a few long rides at weekends, and then work on V02 max stuff late winter early spring.

Andy SG

Ok, I gave Dave Morris a try on Goggle. The best source I found was http://ashwinearl.blogspot.com/2005...-index-and.html

I will look into this further, for sure. This type of training is much more in line with ideas I have seen in running and nordic skiing, and I must make some change for next year. I got improvements using Friel's approach, but I don't find a way of targeting my weakest spot, which at this time is heart and lung capacity, to match my other abilities.

I will start to experiment with block training a bit to see what it means for me. Anyone having a good template in Excel or simillar for planning block training, that they can share?

Bailsibub

Hey Andy, sorry I didn't send any links to info before. Here are some things you may find helpful, especially the info by MTBDoc, who was trained by Dave Morris:

http://forums.mtbr.com/showthread.php?t=46993

http://thewheelsonthebikegoroundand...iodization.html

Trekrider4812

Very true! I wanted to emphasize this.

komwannabe

Hey Dave,

This was an epiphany for me. Your recent post and some of the other things you and others have written along these same lines is exactly what I've been wondering about lately. This is really what I've been thinking could be the case, but I've never tried it yet.

I've been training and racing for about 5 years now, and much of that has been with a couple of well known coaches who have more or less used the basic periodization concepts and HR-based training zones. A few months ago I got an SRM Pro and cancelled the coaching contracts. I've read a lot on this board (although I'm relatively new to it still) and I have read the Coggan/Allen book and used Hunter Allen's 12 week Summer Plan on Training Peaks to get started with my PM-based training experience.

I have been trying to decide whether to use one of Hunter Allen's Winter Plans or whether to use his Threshold Improvement Plan from trainingpeaks.com for the "off-season" training I have coming up for fall/winter this year. Based on what you said, I am really leaning toward using the threshold improvement approach and ignoring the fall/winter long slow days w/ low HR stuff that never seemed to help me much anyway. Having just finished a long race season (February - August), using L3 and SST for a while sounds much more appealing than hammering 2x20's in the middle of L4 or so during the next few months.

Based on your experience, do you think I should go with the threshold improvement approach over the next several months? I have a couple of "off-season" centuries I'm going to be doing and I'd like to "race" those and get those solidly under 5 hours, and then the real racing begins again in February where I live (So. Cal., but don't hold against me). If I go with the threshold improvement plan over the next several months (with a little weight and core work due to my new master's racing age of 50), do you think I will be fried by the time races start again in February?

All the other fall/winter training I've done seemed to take long hours with lots of probably L2 work and didn't seem to accomplish much of anything other than basic fitness. The most productive fall/winter I've ever had seemed to come last year from a shift toward some core work (crunches, etc.) and lots of low cadence, long climbing intervals that were probably at L3 or SST based on what I know now.

I would very much appreciate your comments. Thanks in advance!

daveryanwyoming

Absolutely. I'd do exactly as you suggested, take a short post season breather, start up with Tempo/SST work and then move into L4 work as your base build. It doesn't have to be L4 each and every day, back off and do some longer high or even low SST work some days and do pure 2x20 L4 work on other days. Listen to your body and don't kill yourself on days when L4 just seems too tough. But don't feel you need to accumulate a lot of L1/L2 mileage either. That's the big difference for me, training at Tempo or above or not training at all during the winter. IOW focus your efforts and then rest.

In addition to building FTP you also want to put as much CTL in the bank as you reasonably can so that's another reason to include Tempo and SST in your schedule. Longer rides at Tempo and moderate length SST rides are great ways to build CTL. Riding those centuries at high L2/Tempo pace are good CTL builders as well.

I did nearly 7 months of SST/L4 work indoors last winter and when spring came I was more psyched than ever to ride and train. I think the tight focus and lack of junk miles in this approach can actually help you avoid burnout. The trick is to do your workout, cool down and go home. Don't pad a bunch of excess miles on just because you live in So. Cal and the weather is good. If you want longer rides then plan those for your Tempo or low SST days and keep the more intense work well focused so you recover quickly and are ready for subsequent workouts.

Good luck and keep us posted,
-Dave

Andy SG

Just as a reference
Friends of mine that both run, ski, and bike are getting more and more influenced by a training approach as suggested by Hoff & Helgerud, see for instance
http://www.cyclecambridge.com/top4workouts.html