Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Bike Racing > Health Nutrition and Supplements
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Perpetuem vs accelerade

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 22-08.-2007, 08:33 AM   #1
quinn8it
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 13
Default Perpetuem vs accelerade

Hello... I have been a big fan of Hammer products for a couple years. I have used Heed, Gel and many of there supplements. I was also using Perpetuem occaisionaly with success. Recently I started training for a 4 day ride from San Francisco to Los Angeles. My plan was to consume Perpetuem as my sole fuel source. As I began using perpetuem on my 100 mile training rides I started to have a few problems. 1st: I could not seam to get hydrated. after a few hours I would develop a very dry mouth and could not feel quinched. 2nd: the hydrating was worse at my original dose of 2.25 scoops an hour, but when I dropped down to 2 scoops an hour I felt under fueled late in my ride, and still felt dehydrated. I did feel that at 2.25-2.5 scoops an hour (recomended amount for my weight) that I was properly fueled, and I liked the convenience of one bottle for fuel and hydration...
I just bought a container of accelerade and would like to hear feedback from people who have used both. Can accelerade be used as perpetuem can for your "sole fuel source" for full day efforts? based on nutrition facts comparrisons they line up pretty close. Accelerade has a lot more protien and sugar. the carbs are fairly close....
NUTRITION FACTS: Perpetuem
Serving Size - 2 rounded scoops (69 g)
50 cc scoop = 3.4 tablespoons or 10.1 teaspoons
Calories260
Calories from Fat20
Total Fat2 g
Saturated Fat0.5 g
Total Carbohydrates54 g
Dietary Fiber0 g
Sugars7 g
Protein6 g
Calcium243 mg
Phosphorus (as Sodium Tribasic Phosphate)344 mg Iodine0.03 mg Magnesium11 mg Copper1 mg Chromium (as Chromium Polynicotinate)100 mcg Sodium231 mg Potassium156 mg L-Carnosine100 mg Carnitine (as L-Carnitine Tartrate)50 mg Choline (as Choline Bitartrate)50 mg Maltodextrin, Soy Isolates, Energy Smart®, Lecithin, Dreamsicle Flavor, Sodium Tribasic Phosphate, L-Carnosine, L-Carnitrine Tartrate, Choline Bitartrate, and ChromeMate®, brand Chromium Polynicotinate

Double for comparison
Ingredients for accelerade
Serving Size: 1 Scoop
Amount Per Serving:
Calories: 120
Calories From Fat: 10
Total Fat: 1g 1%
Saturated Fat: 0g 0%
Cholesterol: 10mg 3%
Sodium: 190mg 8%
Potassium: 65mg 2%
Total Carbohydrate: 21g 9%
Dietary Fiber: 0g 0%
Sugars: 20g
Protein: 5g
Vitamin A: 0%
Vitamin C: 100%
Calcium: 4%
Iron: 0%
Vitamin E: 100%
Magnesium: 30%

Ingredients: Sucrose, Whey Protein Concentrate, Fructose, Maltodextrin, Citric Acid, Sodium Chloride, Lecithin, Natural Flavor, Magnesium Oxide Vitamin E Acetate, Ascorbic Acid, L-Arginine, Monopotassium phosphate, FD&C Yellow 5, FD&C Yellow 6.
quinn8it is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27-08.-2007, 07:48 PM   #2
Gymgurl
Registered User
 
Gymgurl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 11
Default Re: Perpetuem vs accelerade

looks like the Hammer is less sugar....but they advertise being diabetic friendly....also looks a little healthier ingredient wise
Gymgurl is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:27 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet