Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Power Training
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


I'm surprised there's been no commentary on T-Max intervals

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-09.-2007, 10:35 PM   #1
bbrauer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 72
Default I'm surprised there's been no commentary on T-Max intervals

especially considering they were featured in the latest Bicycling mag, and apparently received the Andy Coggan seal of approval in a bit of name dropping by the author.

They sound interesting, but I don't see anything substantially different from a standard VO2 max interval. Seem like they both target the same intensity level and energy system.
bbrauer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-09.-2007, 11:21 PM   #2
jbvcoaching
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 205
Default Re: I'm surprised there's been no commentary on T-Max intervals

You have a link?
jbvcoaching is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-09.-2007, 12:27 AM   #3
acoggan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,622
Default Re: I'm surprised there's been no commentary on T-Max intervals

Quote:
Originally Posted by bbrauer
especially considering they were featured in the latest Bicycling mag, and apparently received the Andy Coggan seal of approval in a bit of name dropping by the author.


I should have been quoted as saying something along the lines of "yeah, they sound like they'd hurt, and so should be good for you, but there's no magic in any particular interval workout" - was I?
acoggan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-09.-2007, 02:06 AM   #4
obxbes
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 68
Default Re: I'm surprised there's been no commentary on T-Max intervals

Quote:
Originally Posted by acoggan
I should have been quoted as saying something along the lines of "yeah, they sound like they'd hurt, and so should be good for you, but there's no magic in any particular interval workout" - was I?



Read the article but I don't have a power monitor. Any way to translate this to a heart rate workout
obxbes is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-09.-2007, 03:14 AM   #5
Roadie_scum
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,286
Default Re: I'm surprised there's been no commentary on T-Max intervals

Quote:
Originally Posted by bbrauer
especially considering they were featured in the latest Bicycling mag, and apparently received the Andy Coggan seal of approval in a bit of name dropping by the author.

They sound interesting, but I don't see anything substantially different from a standard VO2 max interval. Seem like they both target the same intensity level and energy system.


That was my read on the situation. I think that's why noone has been jumping up and down about them. You could use them. You could just as well do something else and get a similar effect (5X5's).

I presume you are talking about intervals from the guys in Queensland's studies where they do something like repeated intervals (how many?), duration 60% max time at VO2max and intensity ~100% VO2max? Repeat when HR drops to 60% or after set time period. Is this what you are talking about? Did I recall the details correctly?
Roadie_scum is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-09.-2007, 03:31 AM   #6
dkrenik
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 241
Default Re: I'm surprised there's been no commentary on T-Max intervals

Quote:
Originally Posted by obxbes
Read the article but I don't have a power monitor. Any way to translate this to a heart rate workout

This is addressed in the final paragraph of the article.
Quote:
but I don't see anything substantially different from a standard VO2 max interval.

Actually, they seem something of a "'tweener". From how they say to calculate the duration they look to be ~2.5 - 3.5 min's long. Too long for level 6 perhaps? Not quite long enough for level 5?
Quote:
You have a link?

Doesn't look to be available on-line yet - print only.

Dave
dkrenik is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-09.-2007, 04:36 AM   #7
Roadie_scum
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,286
Default Re: I'm surprised there's been no commentary on T-Max intervals

Quote:
Originally Posted by dkrenik
This is addressed in the final paragraph of the article.

Actually, they seem something of a "'tweener". From how they say to calculate the duration they look to be ~2.5 - 3.5 min's long. Too long for level 6 perhaps? Not quite long enough for level 5?

Doesn't look to be available on-line yet - print only.

Dave


Based on this kind of work??

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/e...Pubmed_RVDocSum
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/e...Pubmed_RVDocSum
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/e...VAbstra ctPlus
Roadie_scum is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-09.-2007, 05:28 AM   #8
dkrenik
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 241
Default Re: I'm surprised there's been no commentary on T-Max intervals

dkrenik is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-09.-2007, 05:38 AM   #9
Roadie_scum
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,286
Default Re: I'm surprised there's been no commentary on T-Max intervals

Quote:
Originally Posted by dkrenik
Nope.
This


Sorry, I should have been clearer. That seems to be a description of what a 'tweener' workout is. I think I have my head around that. I was wondering (since I don't have access to the article) if the Tmax interval workout concept referred to by the OP was based on the links I referred to?
Roadie_scum is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-09.-2007, 05:41 AM   #10
dkrenik
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 241
Default Re: I'm surprised there's been no commentary on T-Max intervals

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadie_scum
Sorry, I should have been clearer. That seems to be a description of what a 'tweener' workout is. I think I have my head around that. I was wondering (since I don't have access to the article) if the Tmax interval workout concept referred to by the OP was based on the links I referred to?

It sure does as Laursen and the University of Queensland are referenced several times in the article.

Dave
dkrenik is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-09.-2007, 07:33 AM   #11
jbvcoaching
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 205
Default Re: I'm surprised there's been no commentary on T-Max intervals

Quote:
Originally Posted by dkrenik
Doesn't look to be available on-line yet - print only.

Is this a fair description of them?
http://mtbjournal.blogspot.com/2007...ure-to-max.html
jbvcoaching is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-09.-2007, 07:48 AM   #12
Roadie_scum
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,286
Default Re: I'm surprised there's been no commentary on T-Max intervals

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbvcoaching
Is this a fair description of them?
http://mtbjournal.blogspot.com/2007...ure-to-max.html


If the Tmax interval concept is from the Laursen work, as I posited and dkrenik seems to confirm, that's pretty spot on. Nothing sensational in them - just another method of targeting VO2max and maybe some amount of AWC depending on your precise PPO and Tmax.

I don't have exact figures right now, but I've been able to hold my VO2max wattage for about 7-10 minutes in the past, which puts 5X5's right in the same ballpark as these. That was off a different test protocol though, which would have resulted in a lower PPO and higher Tmax. No great surprises really. The concept of moderating the interval length to allow repeated intervals to be performed at around PPO/VO2max is not new.

The keys to structuring work like this in my view would be:

(i) Have the interval intense and long enough to attain VO2max.
(ii) Have the interval short enough to allow repeated attaining of VO2max.
(iii) Have the rest periods long enough to ensure repeated attaining of VO2max.

The Laursen approach seems to be one way to reach these goals, though for people with a short Tmax, would it be possible that the interval isn't long enough to attain VO2max? And what determines Tmax? Is it largely AWC? Or something more subtle about VO2 kinetics/metabolic fitness? Or both? I would be surprised if Tmax was all about AWC, as I seem to have a fairly high Tmax and a fairly low AWC.

RS
Roadie_scum is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-09.-2007, 08:07 AM   #13
jbvcoaching
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 205
Default Re: I'm surprised there's been no commentary on T-Max intervals

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadie_scum
And what determines Tmax?

TMax looks a lot like MAP at (my) first glance, which of course has been discussed quite a bit here and elsewhere.

Well said on the rest of the commentary. Looks like a safe, well controlled way to get people to just go hard in a way that's going to have some positive training effect.

To answer obxbes, no you'd generally not want to modulate supra=threshold intervals like these using HR...which will lag too far behind power. PE and a watch, or even speed/distance up a known climb would be effective ways to execute this workout without a PM.
jbvcoaching is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-09.-2007, 08:40 AM   #14
Roadie_scum
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,286
Default Re: I'm surprised there's been no commentary on T-Max intervals

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbvcoaching
TMax looks a lot like MAP at (my) first glance, which of course has been discussed quite a bit here and elsewhere.


Um... doesn't PPO look like MAP? Tmax is a little different right?
Roadie_scum is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-09.-2007, 09:52 AM   #15
dkrenik
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 241
Default Re: I'm surprised there's been no commentary on T-Max intervals

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadie_scum
Um... doesn't PPO look like MAP? Tmax is a little different right?

From the Bicycling magazine article, Tmax = time @ PPO. I suppose PPO does like a bit like MAP (perhaps with different protocols?).

Dave
dkrenik is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 04:19 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet