![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 82
|
A few weeks ago I did a HC which took 8:15 and I averaged 408W NP (400W average). I'd estimate my 5min power is at least 425W.
This time last year I did a 6:05 HC at a similar level of fitness and I averaged 425W @ 70W. However, my FTP is currently only 321W. This is about 6 rows lower on the Power Profile tables. My 1min and 5sec powers (560W and 1200W respectively) are way below these numbers so I don't think my 5min power is elevated by a large anaerobic capacity ( I don't have particularly big muscles and I've done a CP analysis in the past and my AC was about 25k). These figures give me a sharply inverted V profile. I've struggled with consistent training the last few years (a lot of overtraining and stuff), and although I've seen big gains doing FTP work, I've never managed to sustain a block for longer than 4weeks. I therefore don't have much idea of my real FTP potential, and whether I'm a natural inverted V, or whether I can improve my FTP to nearer my 5min power. I've read that 'good' TTers can get their FTP to within 90% of their VO2max values. How much is this percentage defined by genetics? Can people generally achieve, say, 80%, but only a few have the potential to achieve 90%? My goal is TTing so I will be focussing on increasing my FTP. I've also got on top of all the training issues I previously had so expect to train a lot more consistently. My goal for next season is an FTP of 350W (previous best is 335W). Using the 8:15 HC @ 400W as an estimate of my VO2max power (how valid is this?) and assuming it doesn't change, my goal power power will be 88% of my VO2max power. Does this seem achievable? Is 90% (360W) achievable? I think I read that Dr Coggan can reach an FTP of 90% of VO2max power, but isn't he a bit of an aerobic monster? (sorry Andy!). Anyone have any input? Thanks very much! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,689
|
Quote:
Have you done a 'true' dizzy-headed, fall-off-the-bike, 1 minute test? I'd be really surprised to see a 425w 5-min test and a mere 560w 1-min test. 1200w for 5-sec is really not bad either, which also puts the 1-min result into question. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
The 560 was from a dedicated 1min test. I've never done much Z6 training so I dare say it could be improved somewhat, but I don't think by a lot. I once did a few sessions of 30s intervals with 4.5min recovery when I had an FTP of 335W, and could do 10 repeats at 590w, but 12 repeats was too much. Is there much connection between the 5secs and 1min durations? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,743
|
Quote:
e.g. 5 sec is my highest on the power profile. 1 min is my lowest. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 972
|
Quote:
first thing that comes to mind is whether you're comparing apple-apples for ~5MP and FTP powers. Did those hillclimb results involve a lot of standing for instance? Or perhaps are your FTP estimates taken from TT's or workouts in a tight aero position? If neither is the case (comparable positions, motivation, cooling, altitude) then we are talking apples-apples. FTP at 75% of 5MP ... probably on the low side ... though I can't recall seeing many statistics. Re FTP training, a 4-week block is about typical for you? For me that's a break-in period to real threhold training. I did five months steady last year w/o a break and then another three months on top of that.
__________________
rmur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
My TT position doesn't seem to affect my power production at all compared to my road bike position (it's not extreme and I train in the TT position a lot). I picked specific figures for my intial post, but there are plenty more that confirm the V-shape on the power profile. The 4wk FTP blocks were not by design. I'd always tend to get carried away by the big increase I'd see in my numbers doing threshold work and then push too hard trying to make every workout a PB. I'd then go backwards and dump the FTP training for something else. I'm over that now! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 972
|
Quote:
okay. Dem's apples. Sounds like you have your answer then: keep the threshold training steady, incrementally progressive and see where you end up. Think tortoise instead of hare. IIRC, many folks do longish blocks of threshold training 8-12-16 weeks ... even longer. personally I've reached about 87% FTP/5MP ratio - can't say what that would really be in Vo2max terms. 90% is a nice target if you're a TT'r.
__________________
rmur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
Yeah, only way is to give it a go. If I could get FTP to 87% of 5MP I would have a very big smile on my face! Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 29
|
My 5 min. power is actually better than yours, and I would be hard preasured to do more than the 560 watts for a minute too :-( Of course this is one of my week points, and I'm actually racing cyclocross this winter to try to improve this. Just to say - you are NOT the only rider out there with a weak AWC.
You should be able to get your FTP up at around 90% of your 5 min. power unless your AWC is really good (and this doesn't seem to be the case...). Nothing magic here - keep doing long intervals at around FTP. As you have discovered - do not force it, it is better to be a little conservative and then build for a longer time. My experience (to quote NIKE): just do it! Do not get to caried away with PB's - focus on actually doing the planned number of intervals save the PB's for racing! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
Thanks Lars. I've seen evidence of my low 1min power when doing road races - I've often been comfortably in the break getting to the finish or in a good position in the bunch, only to get completely destroyed in a long final sprint. I can live with that though as my focus is mainly TT's. Is/has your FTP been up around the 90% of 5min level? Cheers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
It HAS been (think the highest has been around 87%), but my 5 min. power has improved quite a lot during the last year, and I haven't done the fokused FTP work as I used to (less focus on timetrials) - so now it's FAR from that. (I actually just calculated my FTP to 78% of my 5 min. power - so lots of room for improvements! This was, however in the summer - I have just had a long "end of season brake, so my fitness is a lot worse right now"). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
It's encouraging that you've been up there, as I'm at around 78% as well at the moment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 337
|
I have the same lingering question. My 5 sec power is terrible but 5 min power is pretty good (6-10 rows above FTP) despite doing almost no L5/6 training. If a good 5 min power is due to a good VO2max rather than AWC then I would think there would be more potential to improve FTP.
I've been tempted to get a VO2max test to help answer the question. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 140
|
First, I'm going to speculate that you've never really really busted a gut on your 1 min test. 425/321 = 132%, which is pretty good, suggesting good AC. Your 1 min test suggests bad AC, so there's something wrong here. If you drew a CP graph you would not get anything close to a line (I don't think anyway). Either your 1 min test is wrong (my guess) or your FTP is wrong.
As to your question, your 5min wattage suggests that FTP of 340 (80%) should be easily attainable if you do some L4 work. (You should be able to get better than that even.) So I'm joining the chorus suggesting more FTP intervals. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
Just had a search through my last couple of years in Cyclingpeaks (got nothing before that because I had my laptop stolen - always back up your data!). Best 1min effort I can find is 584W, done while aggressively attacking a 1min climb during an easy group ride. I'm fresh at the moment so I might have a go at a couple of 1min efforts tomorrow. I've never had a problem putting out good efforts in test/races, but maybe having never done any dedicated AC training I somehow can't really hurt myself during a 1min effort? Anyway, it's great that it seems like I have some headroom to improve my FTP. Is there anyone reading who hasn't managed to get their FTP above, say, 80% of their 5min power despite doing plenty of consistent threshold work? |
|
|
|
|