Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Bike Racing > Track Racing
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Track forks: carbon or aluminum steerer? Preferences and why...

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 02-12.-2007, 01:45 AM   #1
tonyzackery
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Seattle, WA/Vancouver BC
Posts: 350
Default Track forks: carbon or aluminum steerer? Preferences and why...

Curious about the above as I'm presently using a carbon steerer fork, but I've noticed some of the world's best on the track swear by forks with aluminum steerers. Is there a noticeable difference in stiffness?
tonyzackery is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12.-2007, 05:30 PM   #2
Jack-o
Registered User
 
Jack-o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bairnsdale, Vic. Australia.
Posts: 85
Default Re: Track forks: carbon or aluminum steerer? Preferences and why...

Quote:
Originally Posted by tonyzackery
Curious about the above as I'm presently using a carbon steerer fork, but I've noticed some of the world's best on the track swear by forks with aluminum steerers. Is there a noticeable difference in stiffness?

Aluminium is better for reasons of stiffness, but also because track riders tend to change handlebars/stems a lot for different events. ie, drop bars swapped for TT bars. The constant tightening of headstems on to a carbon steerer is going to cause more stress than they were designed for, and it only takes one heavy-handed lapse of concentration to do stem bolts up too tight.
Jack-o is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12.-2007, 06:06 PM   #3
tonyzackery
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Seattle, WA/Vancouver BC
Posts: 350
Default Re: Track forks: carbon or aluminum steerer? Preferences and why...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack-o
Aluminium is better for reasons of stiffness, but also because track riders tend to change handlebars/stems a lot for different events. ie, drop bars swapped for TT bars. The constant tightening of headstems on to a carbon steerer is going to cause more stress than they were designed for, and it only takes one heavy-handed lapse of concentration to do stem bolts up too tight.

Thanks for the info...
tonyzackery is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12.-2007, 01:38 PM   #4
BikingBrian
Registered User
 
BikingBrian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Japan
Posts: 254
Default Re: Track forks: carbon or aluminum steerer? Preferences and why...

Recently, I've started seeing a lot of track bikes coming with carbon forks and steerers....I know in theory that they should be ok - and I use a full-carbon fork on my road bike with no qualms whatsoever. But it just seems sort of silly on the track. Not sure what the point is - lighter weight?? I would guess weight of a track bike is a moot point. "Vibration damping" - unless the velodrome surface has lots of cracks and holes??
I use a steel fork/steerer. Peace of mind! And like the poster above said, when you are constantly changing bars and stems between events, I'd rather not have to worry about over-torquing a bolt.
BikingBrian is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12.-2007, 03:29 PM   #5
Jack-o
Registered User
 
Jack-o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bairnsdale, Vic. Australia.
Posts: 85
Default Re: Track forks: carbon or aluminum steerer? Preferences and why...

Quote:
Originally Posted by BikingBrian
Recently, I've started seeing a lot of track bikes coming with carbon forks and steerers....I know in theory that they should be ok - and I use a full-carbon fork on my road bike with no qualms whatsoever. But it just seems sort of silly on the track. Not sure what the point is - lighter weight?? I would guess weight of a track bike is a moot point. "Vibration damping" - unless the velodrome surface has lots of cracks and holes??
I use a steel fork/steerer. Peace of mind! And like the poster above said, when you are constantly changing bars and stems between events, I'd rather not have to worry about over-torquing a bolt.
Suspension forks would be more appropriate on my nearest track
Jack-o is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:33 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet