![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 34
|
Could someone shed some light on the tested versus predicted weight when looking at the CP model? I understand tested but what does predicted mean? Why is there a difference?
Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,357
|
Quote:
Anyway, it's just the way they approached this tool. In general all the weight entries should be the same because you wouldn't want to take short and long tests so far apart that your weight changes substantially and you wouldn't want to use old data to predict what your sustainable power is after substantial time(and weight changes) have happened. -Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 34
|
Thanks for the clarification Dave.
|
|
|
|