![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,689
|
See: http://www.ultrafit.com/newsletter/november07.html#AA
especially paragraph 4 (quoted below). Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 972
|
Quote:
edit: but OTOH, it's apparently higher power than he prescribed before. "Noodling" must indeed have been the operative phrase!
__________________
rmur Last edited by rmur17 : 15-12.-2007 at 01:01 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,689
|
Quote:
You could be right, in my excitement I kinda got lost in all those thresholds and relative math. Still, it's a postive step from noodling along at a relaxed zone-1 effort. I smell another book coming! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,505
|
Quote:
So it seems like he's opening up to the idea of more intense "base" work but still very reluctant to move away from LSD. Funny, but his current recommendations remind me a lot of the way Eddie B tried to redefine LSD from Long "Slow" Distance to Long "Steady" Distance in his book nearly 25 years ago. A small step away from old school base training but a long way from SST work. -Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5
|
SST has been around since the late 70s. Even Lemond's book went over what we call now SST training zones and that was released back when.. early 90s? Late 80s? Keep in mind its about building a new, stronger base for next year not about keeping your base level from last.... lots of zone 2 work wont build much if anything at all.
I have Friels book but dont find it of much use for the way I train but its always a good idea to read what others think. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,246
|
I always recommend Friel for people training seriously for the first time. He really gives you the nuts and bolts of periodization. I usually tell those people that Friel is a bit old school and they shouldn't necessarily follow his advise in the second year.
To me Friel always seemed to be geared towards triathletes...the programs lack intensity. I also get frustrated over his near paranoia about overtraing. In my opinion, very few real people have enough time to train to worry so much about overtraining. By the way, is it Friel that is so worried about training in the red zone (ie Friel's zone 4)? In my opinion, that is where we should be training the most.
__________________
We are all made of stars. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 20
|
Quote:
Due out in Fall '08 according to his June blog entry. Having just completed my first season of racing, I've found Friel's program to be invaluable in establishing structure in my training plan and in conveying the periodization concept. As long as the reader is able to read past the ideas they disagree with (in my case the lack of offseason intensity and the ease of overtraining), it's a great tool. |
|
|
|
|