Re: endless helmet discussions

gdewilde@gmail.com

On Dec 19, 9:14 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "DougC" <dcim...@norcom2000.com> wrote in message
>
> news:7Odaj.89$Tt5.80@newsfe07.lga...
>
>
>
> > ryancycles wrote:
> >> My two cents worth!
> >> I think it's a valid argument that head injuries are less likely on a
> >> recumbent. I've never worn a helmet while riding a recumbent (or any
> >> other type of bike for that matter.)
> >> ....
>
> >> Dick Ryan
>
> > I used to wear helmets all the time too, back about 5 years ago, before I
> > had any recumbents.
>
> > Then I did for the first 2 or 3 years I was riding recumbents only, just
> > out of habit.
>
> > Then I realized that I wasn't real likely to hit my head on the
> > recumbents. They can't be tipped forward from braking, and if I hit
> > anything hard enough to tip a LWB over forward, I doubt a bicycle helmet
> > is going to spare me much damage anyway.
>
> > Also--there's no helmet I've ever found that's as comfortable as riding
> > without a helmet.
>
> > It's rather odd if you consider the history of it: safety bicycles were
> > introduced as an answer to the problem of penny-farthings tipping over
> > forward. ....And yet even today, many of the most-severe injuries people
> > get on modern safety bicycles are STILL head injuries, resulting from
> > tipping over forward or otherwise falling and landing on their heads.
>
> Folks, all of the above goes to demonstrate why laws are needed mandating
> safety measures. It is dangerous to let people think for themselves. More
> often than not, they will come to erroneous conclusions.
>
> Nay, let our legislators tell us what is good for us. They are smarter than
> we are. After all, that is why we elected them - to give us laws to protect
> us from our own ignorance.
>

On Dec 19, 8:48 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> The Dutch are some of the most stubborn folks in the world. To read a
> history of that people will tell you all you will ever have to know about
> them. I consider them to be poor pitiful crazy bastards who simply don't
> know any better. The Spanish should have exterminated them when they had the
> chance some centuries ago.
>

HAHAHAHA,

And I thought I wasn't going to find anything amusing to read today.

we have health care we don't need helmets. hahaHAHahaha

We don't have those commercials so people don't drive silly SUV
vehicles.

We also have bicycle paths.

And something we call "woon erf" where you can only drive (your car)
at walking speed.

But you are quite right of course any 90 year old Dutch cyclist would
beat you over the head with the helm the moment you suggest he or she
should wear one.

Why would you stop with bikes I wonder?

Why not put everyone in the city into protective reflector clothing?
Could put an alarm light on the center of the helmet. I mean it's
awfully messy when you smash your SUV into a group of pedestrians?
Those people should wear protective clothing, it would be better for
them. We could put tazers in them to give warning signals when they
don't clear the road fast enough again.

I made photos of all this Dutchness.
http://fototour.blogspot.com

Here is one I specially picked for you.
http://photos1.blogger.com/hello/77...24/IMG_7223.jpg

She is even wearing a T shirt. hahahahahaha