![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= how and why. did it start? -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- The harassment didn't start by itself, so someone. must have been there at the outset to give it a firm push and. set the "animals" after me. It looks as if. I was set up in June 1990, and the timing indicates someone from university. was responsible. >One thing which has been missing from this. discussion is this simple >prognosis: that maybe he is right and that, despite. his admitted >mental condition, there really. is a campaign against him organised by >now-influential ex-students of. his university. In May or June 1990, Alan Freeman on Radio. 1 read out a letter from someone who had known me for a few years, who. wrote of the one who "wore out his welcome with random precision". (from the Pink Floyd song). Freeman went on to say to the writer "that's a hell of a letter. you wrote there". The indication is strongly that people I had parted. from soon before nursed a grudge against me. and were trying to cause trouble for me. The suggestion is that Freeman might. have shown the letter to other people, and things could have snowballed from there. Right from the start. the real source (security services presumed). didn't announce themselves as the origin,. but let the "talkers", the radio DJs, believe that they were the originators. Think about it; if you. announce, "we're MI5 and we have a campaign against this bloke" then. people might not go along with it; but if you say, "everyone else. is getting at this bloke because he 'deserves' it" then people. will join in with fewer qualms. >Why would "they". wish to assassinate your character? It's the classic case of hitting a cripple to prove you're. stronger. Why would the security services expend hundreds of thousands of pounds and. more than six years of. manpower to try to kill a British citizen? Because they are motivated by people who knew me at university. and feel personal animosity; because they knew me to be emotionally weak, and. it is in the nature of bullies to prey on. those known to be weak; and because they can rely on the complicity of. the establishment, which the security services manipulate. and derive funding from. This is England's biggest humiliation today,. and the British security services are intent on preventing their humiliation becoming reality by. continuing their campaign of attempted murder. to suppress the truth from becoming public. 10229 |
|