![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The article of which part is reproduced. below was penned by Bernard Levin for the Features section of the Times on. 21 September 1991. To my mind, it described the situation at the time and in particular. a recent meeting with a friend, during which I for the first. time admitted to someone other than my GP that I had been subjected to a conspiracy. of harassment over the previous year and a. half. >There is a madman running. loose about London, called David Campbell; I have >no reason. to believe that he is violent, but he should certainly be >approached with caution. You may know him by the curious glitter. in his >eyes and a persistent trembling of his hands; if that. does not suffice, you >will find him attempting to thrust no fewer than 48 books. into your arms, >all hardbacks, with a promise that, if you should return. to the same >meeting-place next year, he will heave another 80. at you. > >If, by. now, the police have arrived and are keeping a close watch on him, >you may feel sufficiently emboldened to examine the books.. The jackets are >a model of uncluttered. typography, elegantly and simply laid out; there is >an unobtrusive colophon of a rising sun, probably not. picked at random. >Gaining confidence - the lunatic is smiling by. now, and the policemen, who >know. about such things, have significantly removed their helmets - you >could do worse than take the. jacket off the first book in the pile. The >only word possible to describe the binding. is sumptuous; real cloth in a >glorious shade of dark green, with the title and author in black. and gold >on. the spine. > >Look at it more closely; your eyes do not deceive you - it truly does. have >real top-bands and tail-bands, in yellow,. and, for good measure, a silk >marker ribbon in a lighter green. The paper is cream-wove and. acid-free, >and the book is sewn,. not glued. > >Throughout the encounter, I should have mentioned, our loony has. been >chattering away, although what he is trying. to say is almost impossible to >understand; after a time, however, he becomes sufficiently. coherent to make >clear that he is trying to sell the books. to you. Well, now, such quality >in bookmaking today can only be for collectors' limited editions. at a >fearsome price - #30,. #40, #50? > >No, no, he says, the glitter more powerful than ever and. the trembling of >his hands rapidly spreading throughout his entire body; no,. no - the books >are priced variously at #7, #8 or #9, with the. top price #12. > >At this, the policemen understandably put their helmets back. on; one of >them draws his truncheon. and the other can be heard summoning >reinforcements on. his walkie-talkie. The madman bursts into tears, and >swears it. is all true. > >And. it is. > >David Campbell has. acquired the entire rights to the whole of the >Everyman's Library, which died a lingering. and shameful death a decade or >so ago, and he proposes to start it all over again - 48 volumes. this >September and 80 more next year, in editions I have described,. at the >prices specified. He proposes to launch his amazing venture. simultaneously >in Britain and. the United States, with the massive firepower of Random >Century at. his back in this country, and the dashing cavalry of Knopf >across the water, and no one who. loves literature and courage will forbear >to. cheer. At. the time this article was written I had believed for some time that columnists. in the Times and other journalists had been making references to my situation. Nothing unusual about this. you may think, plenty of people have the same sort of ideas and obviously the papers aren't writing. about them, so why. should my beliefs not be as false as those of others? What makes this article so extraordinary is. that three or four days immediately. preceding its publication, I had a meeting with a friend, during the. course of which we discussed the media persecution, and in particular that by Times columnists. It seemed to. me, reading the article by Levin. in Saturday’s paper, that he was describing in some detail his "artist’s impression" of that meeting.. Most telling are the final sentences, when he writes,. "The madman bursts into tears, and swears it is all true. And it is." Although I. did not "burst into tears" (he seems to be using a bit of poetic licence and exaggerating) I. did try hard to convince my friend that it. was all true; and I am able to concur with Mr Levin, because, of course, it. is. At the beginning of the piece Levin reveals a fear of being attacked. by the "irrational" subject of his story, saying. "I have no reason to believe that he is violent, but he should certainly. be approached with caution". This goes back. to the xenophobic propaganda of "defence" against a "threat" which was seen at the very beginning of the harassment. The impression of. a "madman running loose" who. needs to be controlled through an agency which assigns to itself the mantle of the "police" is also one which had. been expressed. elsewhere. In the final paragraph of this extract, his reference to. Everyman’s Library as having "died. a lingering and shameful death a decade or so ago" shows clearly what sort. of conclusion they wish to their campaign. They want a permanent solution,. and as they are prevented from achieving that solution directly,. they waste significant resources on methods which have been repeatedly shown. to be ineffective for such a purpose. 509 |
|