![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 56
|
I notice that when I push my power output to the new limits I often have to pause for a second or two (and sometimes more) during my 2x20 min intervals or 1 hr FTP tests. The rest is enough for my heart rate to drop rapidly by 10 to 15 beats.
I wonder is this detrimental to training effect? Is it better to complete the interval in one solid effort, or do these small "breaks" make no difference. I wonder if I continued in a solid block if my heart rate would continue to creep up well above the lactic threshold? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,378
|
Quote:
HR is a response to system stress and not the cause. It's normal for HR to drift upwards all the way to the end of long steady power intervals. If you try to stay below a preset maximum HR your only choice is to drop power as the interval progresses or take breaks as you've been doing. Neither is great from a training standpoint nor necessary. If you're using power you should ignore HR during your SST or L4 efforts. If you're not using power you should pace on perceived exertion. If you're having to take breaks because the effort is too hard to sustain then you should back off to a level you can sustain for the duration. Good luck, Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: IN PEACE AND QUIET
Posts: 1,335
|
Hello!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 56
|
Thanks for the response. However I don't do these rests because my heart is in trouble. I don't even notice anything different with the heart, nor do I care about the heart rate at the times I pause. I was just saying that the duration of the pause is couple of seconds which is enough for my heart rate to drop 10 - 15 beats, not that I had to stop because my heart rate was to high.
The reason I have to pause is leg fatigue, my leg muscles just feel like they are "choking" (must be lactic acid buildup). So, 2 - 5 second pause (and sometimes 20 sec pause) is enough for me to clear up and continue. So, my question then is this bad or detrimental to the training effect. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 56
|
Quote:
But still it has inspired me enough and I'm pleased to say that I made a huge improvement as well. I'm currently at 271 Watts, and hoping to be at 300 in a month or so. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,378
|
Quote:
Your question reminds me of the times I've struggled to put out best effort 20 minute intervals day after day. You don't need or necessarily want to challenge your personal best power numbers very often, especially during times of continuous base building. It can be a road to mental burnout and you get nearly all the training benefit by backing down a bit and perhaps more benefit by extending the efforts longer. If you back off your efforts say 5-10% in terms of FTP you should be able to complete them in continuous blocks and maybe even in longer blocks. That approach can yield more time in level and more CTL for similar time on the bike compared to max 15 to 20 minute efforts interspersed with rests. I'm sure one of the exercise physiologists could comment on half lives of metabolic adaptation and whether your 30 second micro rests are really a problem. But if you can back off just a bit and hold those efforts continuously I've gotta believe the overall training benefit will be better. Good luck, -Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 926
|
Quote:
In all seriousness, would you climb or TT like that? And I don't see how your HR drops 10-15 bpm in 1 to 2 seconds?
__________________
rmur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: IN PEACE AND QUIET
Posts: 1,335
|
Quote:
Good work Piotr. If we band together we can keep the spam of this page. Even if regulars only bring a couple of threads forward it helps. ![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 56
|
Thanks for your detailed reply. I do notice that I have these mini breaks even when I'm not pushing myself too hard at all. I suspect this is because I do all my interval training (including 1 hr FTP test) on an ergometer with constant Watt program. This program keeps adjusting resistance to account for the cadence or pedal force fluctuations to keep your power output constant.
I would normally vary my gears, cadence etc when I cycle on a "real" bike and have rest intervals etc. But this thing is brutal. If I push myself to new power limits, and allow my cadence to drop below 100 RPM the resistance this thing goes into is so hard that I have to get up and stomp on the pedal to over come it and try to increase my cadence so that it becomes easier to pedal. So, that could be the reason why I do it, in addition to most likely pushing myself too hard. In the last 2 months I have increased my interval wattages by 60%, roughly 13 watts increase every week. And I know that you are supposed to increase your training load (FTP test) by 5 Watts every other week . |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 56
|
Quote:
, so I have to keep the power output constant. |
|
|
|
|