![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1
|
about a month after getting my first recumbent i was hit by a car on my commute and fractured my pelvis. i've been commuting for about 2 and a half years. this guy just didn't see me and i think he would have hit me on an upright. my question is: are there more accidents on recumbents or was i just unlucky and shouldn't worry about it.
thanks in advance, adam |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lake Crystal, MN
Posts: 23
|
Quote:
I have 25-30,000 miles of cycling under my 59 year old saddle, the last 7-8,000 on recumbent trikes. I always ride in a bright, construction worker colored, neon lime green jersey. I think I am much safer on my recumbents than I was on my wedgies. I may be a bit lower, but I am also a bit wider, and a bit stranger looking. That's my take on it, anyway.
__________________
from southern Minnesota |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
I have always been noticed on my LWB recumbent (noticed, whistled at, hooted at, cheered), and the only accident I have had on it was my own stupid fault - got distracted, lost control and came off rather too fast. Spent four months on crutches. There will of course be far fewer recumbent accidents than standard bike accidents, simply because there are far fewer recumbents on the roads. Bear in mind though, that many people who have recumbents travel many miles on them (some don't have a car) and are also rarely children (the group most likely to have an accident, at least in the UK). All things considered, recumbent riders are probably on average more experienced, older, wealthier, go further and travel faster than the average upright (or upwrong) rider. Don't know whether that helps. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 56
|
I was living it up at the local bar, and later almost squashed a recumbo flat taking a right turn.
I would say yes, they are more dangerous. Just kidding. Actually they are just as safe, but it all depends on the moment of visual contact. If the vehicle establishes a visual as it is passing you, you are fine. They will not soon forget the image of a recumbent cyclist, and take your flightpath into consideration. A right turn by a vehicle is the potential snag. Changing your speed after they pass to execute a right turn (vehicle, not you) can have you flying headfirst into a newspaper machine (true story). Bumper to bumper city traffic? More dangerous on a recumbent, I would say. Course correction, and altitude of your screaming mug will make a difference. |
|
|
|