![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 51
|
Hi, i'm a pretty big newbie when it comes to training and terms. I know CTL has to do with your training load, right? Do you need one of the cycling programs to figure it out? Or is there some way i can do some math and figure it out? Also, what is the main benefit of knowing it, just so you can either stay consistent or increase training without just adding time/intensity but switching the workouts up?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,359
|
Quote:
Quote:
- Normalized Power using 30 second smoothing and pwr^4 averaging - Intensity Factor = NP/FTP - TSS = IF^2*hours*100 - CTL = CTL(d-1) + [TSS-CTL(d-1)]*[1 - exp^(-1/42)] - ATL = ATL(d-1) + [TSS-ATL(d-1)]*[1 - exp^(-1/7)] - TSB = CTL-ATL All of that is easy to drop into a spreadsheet but it's much easier to just use WKO+. A spreadsheet version can still be useful for forward looking CTL, ATL and TSB estimates for instance when planning a race taper. Quote:
In short, it's another training metric. Just as valuable or usesless as any others depending on how much time you take to understand it and how you apply the results. Check out this piece on the PMC: http://www.cyclingpeakssoftware.com...ancemanager.asp Good luck, Dave |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 51
|
thanks as always to you dave for the super informative reply!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Northumberland. UK
Posts: 101
|
Hi
A long time ago Dave Ryan said: Quote:
I get all my data off a CompuTrainer or PowerTap and I'm finding that my TSB on the PMC does not always conform to the TSB=CTL-ATL formula, any ideas why that might be? Sure beats me! It will be spot on for a couple of days and then be a bit different, for example my TSB on 01.06.2006 was -21.9 with a CTL of 65.1 and an ATL of 91.4 so in theory my TSB should have been -26.3. Just trying to understand. ![]() Hmm.. Think I've worked it out, the CTL is the figure for the NEXT day? What an idiot ![]() Thanks. PBUK
__________________
What do you mean your legs are hurting? Give it some welly man! Visit My Training Weblog |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, USA
Posts: 3,561
|
Quote:
Today's TSB equals yesterday's CTL minus yesterday's ATL. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,359
|
Quote:
TSB(d) = CTL(d-1) - ATL(d-1) -Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 62
|
Quote:
Dave, what value/cell reference/operator should I be using when you indicate "exp" in this formula? (I'm trying to set this up in Excel) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,359
|
Quote:
So for instance CTL based on CTL from the previous day, TSS, and using a 42 day time constant can be entered into Excel as: "=ROUND(G2+(D3-G2)*(1-EXP(-1/42)),1)" That adds a 1 decimal place rounding and in the case of the spreadsheet I pulled it from G2 represents previous day CTL, D3 represents current day TSS and this formula was pulled from cell G3 so copying the formula down(ctrl-d) the G column calculates running CTL over many days or weeks. You seed the sequence by putting your starting CTL into cell G2 in this example. -Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 91
|
Quote:
If you get there, would you mind sharing it? I'm an Excel klutz, and the Training Peaks software is only PC. I've tried to find an Excel spreasheet, but no luck so far. Not to mention, I only have hand-copied Power data from my Tacx trainer, not anything I can upload from a Powertap or SRM. B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 62
|
Quote:
Dave's 11:10 post solved it perfectly. Right now I'm just experimenting with how much info I want to include, but I could send you a working copy as I think I've got it working. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,359
|
Quote:
http://groups.google.com/group/wattage/topics You've gotta join the wattage group which is free but full of good information. Once you join, go to the files page and look for: PMC Template_Modified.xls It's a very nice PMC tool that supports forward looking load planning. -Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 926
|
Quote:
*(1-EXP(-1/42)) with /(tc+0.5) where tc=42 for CTL, tc=7 for ATL try it . Should be quite close unless you drop tc very low and that's not pertinent for pseudo-PMC purposes. IMHO I don't believe it's appropriate to carry a decimal point for any TSS, CTL, ATL or TSB factor. With the inherent degree of inaccuracy present firstly in the PM readings and secondly in how we all establish FTP, I think it's unjustified.
__________________
rmur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,359
|
Quote:
![]() -Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 62
|
Quote:
Wow. That's cool. Now I want to figure it out. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 91
|
Quote:
Any way of actually calculating this? Trying to get some TSS figures from my trainer sessions - my Tacx Flow gives me power and then average power per session. My understanding is that on a trainer doing long intervals, Normalized Power and Average Power should be about the same? I realise that this isn't going to be as accurate as going the whole Powertap/Cyclingpeaks route, but would at least give me some figures to monitor. Any help/info appreciated. B |
|
|
|
|