Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Power Training
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Quark - Status

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 24-01.-2008, 11:48 PM   #1
Felt_Rider
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,227
Default Quark - Status

I was wondering this morning if this was a product that would actually come to market.

Here is an update: Link

Okay....so which one of you will step out on the release date and get this for an official test?
__________________
My Blog
Felt_Rider is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-01.-2008, 01:19 AM   #2
Felt_Rider
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,227
Default Re: Quark - Status

Youch!!!!......Out of my price range when considering the comparison to the already proven Powertap.

$1100 just for crank spider and my shimano crank is not on their list
$750 if I used the Garmin 705 as a head unit
or
$1000 for the Quark head unit
$400 + for an acceptable crank
__________________
My Blog
Felt_Rider is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-01.-2008, 02:44 AM   #3
jbvcoaching
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 204
Default Re: Quark - Status

Quote:
Originally Posted by Felt_Rider
Youch!!!!......Out of my price range when considering the comparison to the already proven Powertap.

$1100 just for crank spider and my shimano crank is not on their list
$750 if I used the Garmin 705 as a head unit
or
$1000 for the Quark head unit
$400 + for an acceptable crank

Closer in price to the bottom of the line SRM amateur, hundreds below the Pro...forget about compact, Dura Ace, or Hollowgram SRM. Arguably as a crank based, fairly full featured system, that's the audience they're targeting. If I were in the market for a crank based powermeter (I personally use powertaps, and I'm a former SRM user) I'd be very interested in seeing how the Quark turns out in terms of accuracy, durability, and customer service.

I think they're coming in at a pretty smart pricepoint...perhaps too pricy for me, but I don't think they were out to beat Power Tap at the low end of the market anyway. SRM seems an easier target to go after.
jbvcoaching is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-01.-2008, 02:45 AM   #4
bbrauer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 70
Default Re: Quark - Status

Quote:
Originally Posted by Felt_Rider
I was wondering this morning if this was a product that would actually come to market.

Here is an update: Link

Okay....so which one of you will step out on the release date and get this for an official test?
I asked Jim Meyer about doing a product test and writing a review in Pez and he was receptive to the idea. We'll see.
__________________
www.liquidfitness.com
bbrauer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-01.-2008, 02:50 AM   #5
Felt_Rider
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,227
Default Re: Quark - Status

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbvcoaching
I think they're coming in at a pretty smart pricepoint...perhaps too pricy for me, but I don't think they were out to beat Power Tap at the low end of the market anyway. SRM seems an easier target to go after.

That's kind of what I was assuming.
Setting their pricepoint between the two and having the ability to attact Garmin users is pretty good.
__________________
My Blog
Felt_Rider is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-01.-2008, 02:57 AM   #6
bbrauer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 70
Default Re: Quark - Status

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbvcoaching
Closer in price to the bottom of the line SRM amateur, hundreds below the Pro...forget about compact, Dura Ace, or Hollowgram SRM. Arguably as a crank based, fairly full featured system, that's the audience they're targeting. If I were in the market for a crank based powermeter (I personally use powertaps, and I'm a former SRM user) I'd be very interested in seeing how the Quark turns out in terms of accuracy, durability, and customer service.

I think they're coming in at a pretty smart pricepoint...perhaps too pricy for me, but I don't think they were out to beat Power Tap at the low end of the market anyway. SRM seems an easier target to go after.
One advantage they have over everyone else is the Linux based open source software code for the Brain. Foreseeably a programmer could develop an algorithm based app that would, say, display a running TSS counter or current/average normative power.....or anything else a programmer can think of.

Also, ANT+ is an "open" transmission system, which is why a Garmin that uses ANT+ will work as well. As time passes, more head unit options that are ANT + compatible will be able to operate with the Quarq spider.

I think these too things are the most exciting possibilities with Quarq. That, and it's comparatively light vs. Powertap, less expensive than SRM, you can use your own wheels....etc. Oh, and Jim said he was working on a Dura Ace compatible spider.

We'll see, however, about a product actually coming to market and it's durability. I think we've all heard about the warranty replacement issues with Ergomo.
__________________
www.liquidfitness.com
bbrauer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25-01.-2008, 05:57 AM   #7
donrhummy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 243
Default Re: Quark - Status

I agree that it sounds like a great product idea (love the open format that allows you to program stuff for it) but the price is ridiculous. These things are always too expensive.

I was looking forward to the Minoura powermeter (in the shoe) because it sounded like it would be relatively affordable (I think it was under $200), but it looks like it might be vaporware.
donrhummy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03.-2008, 05:03 AM   #8
walser
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 11
Default Re: Quark - Status

There is a blog entry from field testing in Solvang at quarq.us now. It seems like the product is working well, apparently they had no data dropouts or other "weirdness on the road".
There are some wko files with data from both Quarq and PT 2.4 as well. I must say it looks promising!
walser is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:35 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet