Cycling and bicycle racing discussion forums.   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage


Go Back   Cycling Forums > Bike Racing > Grand Tours - Giro - Tour de France - Vuelta a España
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


blood doping

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 05-04.-2008, 12:47 PM   #1
thunder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,200
Default blood doping

I think all the folks on the DP that are apologists and anti-Lemond assume blood doping HAD to be prevalent in the 1980's because of Moser and Los Angeles '84 Olympic team.

But blood doping with their own blood had limited advantage. Without EPO to boost, they lose much advantage for training, and they cannot store multiple bags without the preservatives as the expiry is about 60 days. You try taking out 3 bags worth in 60 days before the end of a Giro, then replace them, and see how you do. I reckon they could hardly train if they took out that much blood, and without EPO one bag's worth will never be replenished completely in that 60.

Obviously it helps.

But I think what they missed, is EPO enabled blood transfusions also. They went hand in hand.
thunder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04.-2008, 01:02 PM   #2
Bro Deal
Registered User
 
Bro Deal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Resting by the Tumtum tree
Posts: 5,602
Default Re: blood doping

I am not buying into most of Stratgey's argument. It rests mostly on things that could have happened or were technically feasible at the time and it ignores the timing of jump in performance of many second rate riders. The riders themselves put the date in the 90 - 93 time frame.

Here's what Eddy Planckaert said, "Hugo Camps was the first person who had asked me whether I have earlier used EPO. It was spontaneous conversation and I gave an honest answer. It should be noted that EPO was at that time not forbidden and was not listed on the doping list. Above all it was not known until 1991 and then I was at that end of my career."

He also said this about its effectiveness, "I had a 15 per cent advantage on the riders who did not take it."
__________________
"You are like the wind and I like the lion. You form the tempest. The sand stings my eyes and the ground is parched. I roar in defiance but you do not hear. But between us there is a difference. I, like the lion, must remain in my place. While you like the wind will never know yours." -- Mulay Hamid El Raisuli, Lord of the Riff, Sultan to the Berbers, Last of the Barbary Pirates
Bro Deal is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04.-2008, 01:04 PM   #3
thunder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,200
Default Re: blood doping

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bro Deal
I am not buying into most of Stratgey's argument. It rests mostly on things that could have happened or were technically feasible at the time and it ignores the timing of jump in performance of many second rate riders. The riders themselves put the date in the 90 - 93 time frame.

Here's what Eddy Planckaert said, "Hugo Camps was the first person who had asked me whether I have earlier used EPO. It was spontaneous conversation and I gave an honest answer. It should be noted that EPO was at that time not forbidden and was not listed on the doping list. Above all it was not known until 1991 and then I was at that end of my career."

He also said this about its effectiveness, "I had a 15 per cent advantage on the riders who did not take it."

I meant blood transfusion-doping. I was ambiguous.

But, agreed.
thunder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04.-2008, 02:24 PM   #4
kennf
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 508
Default Re: blood doping

Quote:
Originally Posted by thunder
I think all the folks on the DP that are apologists and anti-Lemond assume blood doping HAD to be prevalent in the 1980's because of Moser and Los Angeles '84 Olympic team.

But blood doping with their own blood had limited advantage. Without EPO to boost, they lose much advantage for training, and they cannot store multiple bags without the preservatives as the expiry is about 60 days. You try taking out 3 bags worth in 60 days before the end of a Giro, then replace them, and see how you do. I reckon they could hardly train if they took out that much blood, and without EPO one bag's worth will never be replenished completely in that 60.

Obviously it helps.

But I think what they missed, is EPO enabled blood transfusions also. They went hand in hand.


Totally agree. It's one thing to use blood transfusions for a one-day event (Moser hour record, or the Olympics). Quite a different proposition to successfully transfuse over a three week tour, which would require refrigeration, transport, etc. The only "consistent" doping pre-'89 had to have been limited to stimulants.
__________________
"Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things"

-- Some dude
kennf is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04.-2008, 09:42 PM   #5
italiano
Registered User
 
italiano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: With my kids if not biking or at my computer
Posts: 214
Default Re: blood doping

Read strat carefuly... he good writer, smart, knows much..he dishonest intentional i think… he politely, softly said that smart knowing person as him should say not.

Then read RR…he say same as strat.. same thing… a little later…not softly…rudely, aroganly… all anti lemond...

They twin, one person... italiano thinks…good cup..bad cup..strat, as bobke hypocrit about all CSC, Riis ...

Edit for substance....

Australians (name?) proved EPO and blodd transfusions speard together after yr. 2000 as supplementing one another...just as thunder say...also...ther is crit statistics...it show clear...as riders say, EPO spread from yr. 1990...
__________________
For inches and centimetres, let fools contend."
-- Damian Grammaticus

Last edited by italiano : 05-04.-2008 at 10:42 PM.
italiano is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04.-2008, 10:14 PM   #6
Wayne666
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 383
Default Re: blood doping

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bro Deal
The riders themselves put the date in the 90 - 93 time frame.

Almost everything I've read indicates that there were several years between EPO becoming available, in '88 I believe, and everyone in the peloton being on it, probably by '94 or '95.

Seems like the doping arms race didn't exist until EPO. IOW, riders were using relatively weak PEDs like steroids, amphetamines, etc. that probably provide marginal benefits and were not absolutely necessary to compete. Riders/docs were not in search of the next "big" drug because it wasn't appreciated that the way to big gains was blood manipulation. Sure smart ones must have known about blood doping but for technical and practical reasons it was probably not used except perhaps in a few cases. Hence EPO was around for a little while before it was "discovered".

However once lots of riders started using EPO since it was so easy it became common knowledge that this was the way forward. Once the window started to close on unrestricted EPO use the "arms race" started, with some enterprising docs (e.g. Fuentes) moving forward by offering transfusions. By that point it was clear to everyone that to gain an advantage you needed to get more oxygen to the muscles, hence transfusions, probably some have been using the artificial hemoglobins.

I see no other reasonable explanation for how EPO was around for a few years but by all accounts was not immediately jumped upon by the cyclists, nor the lack of significant blood doping.
Wayne666 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04.-2008, 10:32 PM   #7
thunder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,200
Default Re: blood doping

Quote:
Originally Posted by italiano
Read strat carefuly... he good writer, smart, knows much..he dishonest intentional i think… he politely, softly said that smart knowing person as him should say not.

Then read RR…he say same as strat.. same thing… a little later…not softly…rudely, aroganly… all anti lemond...

They twin, one person... italiano thinks…good cup..bad cup..strat, as bobke hypocrit about all CSC, Riis ...

I agree Italiano
thunder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04.-2008, 10:34 PM   #8
thunder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,200
Default Re: blood doping

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayne666
Almost everything I've read indicates that there were several years between EPO becoming available, in '88 I believe, and everyone in the peloton being on it, probably by '94 or '95.

Seems like the doping arms race didn't exist until EPO. IOW, riders were using relatively weak PEDs like steroids, amphetamines, etc. that probably provide marginal benefits and were not absolutely necessary to compete. Riders/docs were not in search of the next "big" drug because it wasn't appreciated that the way to big gains was blood manipulation. Sure smart ones must have known about blood doping but for technical and practical reasons it was probably not used except perhaps in a few cases. Hence EPO was around for a little while before it was "discovered".

However once lots of riders started using EPO since it was so easy it became common knowledge that this was the way forward. Once the window started to close on unrestricted EPO use the "arms race" started, with some enterprising docs (e.g. Fuentes) moving forward by offering transfusions. By that point it was clear to everyone that to gain an advantage you needed to get more oxygen to the muscles, hence transfusions, probably some have been using the artificial hemoglobins.

I see no other reasonable explanation for how EPO was around for a few years but by all accounts was not immediately jumped upon by the cyclists, nor the lack of significant blood doping.

Roche must have been on solid gear in 87.
thunder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04.-2008, 11:27 PM   #9
classic1
Registered User
 
classic1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Barwon Prison via Collingwood
Posts: 3,107
Default Re: blood doping

Quote:
Originally Posted by thunder
Roche must have been on solid gear in 87.
I wouldn't call steroids 'weak' PED's. Every bloke I know who has used them reckons they made a big difference.

Italian cycling was rubbish in 88 and 89, then it started to turn around in 1990, with the the incredible results of riders like Bugno, Ballerini, Argentin. Why? Argentin was deemed past it in 1990, Bugno was a good journeyman 6th year pro and Ballerini was a nobody. 1990 was the year EPO really started IMO, with it being rampant in the whole peloton and in middle distance running by 93.
__________________
Collingwood - 2008 AFL Premiers

classic1 is on the bandwagon early this year
classic1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04.-2008, 11:30 PM   #10
thunder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,200
Default Re: blood doping

Quote:
Originally Posted by classic1
I wouldn't call steroids 'weak' PED's. Every bloke I know who has used them reckons they made a big difference.

Italian cycling was rubbish in 88 and 89, then it started to turn around in 1990, with the the incredible results of riders like Bugno, Ballerini, Argentin. Why? Argentin was deemed past it in 1990, Bugno was a good journeyman 6th year pro and Ballerini was a nobody. 1990 was the year EPO really started IMO, with it being rampant in the whole peloton and in middle distance running by 93.

classic, I never called roids weak.

and the "every guy I know..." sounds alot like...

"I have a friend of mine, who is worried he might be gay, cos he likes to suck cjock, what do you have for advice?"

thunder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04.-2008, 11:39 PM   #11
classic1
Registered User
 
classic1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Barwon Prison via Collingwood
Posts: 3,107
Default Re: blood doping

Quote:
Originally Posted by thunder
classic, I never called roids weak.

and the "every guy I know..." sounds alot like...

"I have a friend of mine, who is worried he might be gay, cos he likes to suck cjock, what do you have for advice?"

Lets be clear.

I never used to take PED's
I've never partaken of ghey manlove.

I raced in the late 80's and early 90's, plus I had the added 'bonus' of racing many of my fathers acquaintences at the tail end of their careers in the pro-ams (or heard the stories of the ex-eurodog retired ones). Stanazol, testosterone, captigon, caffiene, ephidrine and (if you had mates coming back from Belgium) 'the pot' were rampant.
__________________
Collingwood - 2008 AFL Premiers

classic1 is on the bandwagon early this year
classic1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04.-2008, 11:43 PM   #12
thunder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,200
Default Re: blood doping

Quote:
Originally Posted by classic1
Lets be clear.

I never used to take PED's
I've never partaken of ghey manlove.

I raced in the late 80's and early 90's, plus I had the added 'bonus' of racing many of my fathers acquaintences at the tail end of their careers in the pro-ams (or heard the stories of the ex-eurodog retired ones). Stanazol, testosterone, captigon, caffiene, ephidrine and (if you had mates coming back from Belgium) 'the pot' were rampant.

awfully defensive

on the ghey manonman AK SHORN!

<facetious>
thunder is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04.-2008, 11:48 PM   #13
classic1
Registered User
 
classic1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Barwon Prison via Collingwood
Posts: 3,107
Default Re: blood doping

Quote:
Originally Posted by thunder
awfully defensive

on the ghey manonman AK SHORN!

<facetious>
Get farked. And don't bother making anymore booty calls to my number either, you bitch.
__________________
Collingwood - 2008 AFL Premiers

classic1 is on the bandwagon early this year
classic1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04.-2008, 11:49 PM   #14
Wayne666
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 383
Default Re: blood doping

Quote:
Originally Posted by classic1
I wouldn't call steroids 'weak' PED's.

I would for endurance sports.
Wayne666 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04.-2008, 11:50 PM   #15
thunder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,200
Default Re: blood doping

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayne666
I would for endurance sports.

anyone got the Outside Magazine link handy. What was that guy on, just roids, hgh.

Testo and hgh, not sure he did EPO.
thunder is offline  
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:13 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com

Links to websites we like:
Pezcyclingnews | Cyclingnews.com | Wine Zone | iinet