Cycling Forums   View New Forum Topics
Today's Forum Topics

Set as homepage

Go Back   Cycling Forums > Tech Corner > Cycling Equipment > rec.bicycles.tech
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to CyclingForums.com

You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread.

By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds.


Re: 25-30 km/h: 700*23 or 28 Which is better?

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 01-05.-2008, 05:11 AM   #1
landotter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 25-30 km/h: 700*23 or 28 Which is better?

On Apr 30, 2:50 pm, N8N <njna...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 29, 1:58 pm, landotter <landot...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 29, 12:20 pm, Mirco Zorzo <mircozo...@toglimi.tin.it> wrote:

>
> > > Hi, looking for long ride with less effort which of this tyre size is
> > > better for minimize the combination of rolling resistance and aerodynamics?

>
> > Aerodynamics don't matter unless you're riding at pro levels. Choose
> > 28mm tires if you want a little more comfort over rough roads, pinch
> > flat protection, or you are a heavier rider. I'm not going to comment
> > on the rolling resistance but to say that "garden hose" type tires
> > certainly are palpably slow, some kevlar belted tires can feel slow,
> > but supple and reasonably narrow tires of various brands will all roll
> > very well, red ones slightly better than most.

>
> Is that something like "stickers add 10 HP" or is there really
> something about current red-colored tread compounds that reduce
> hysteresis or otherwise reduce rolling resistance?


It's a color shift thing!

>
> Just curious, as I'm currently running 700Cx32s so this discussion is
> pretty academic at the moment (and I'm not sure with my impressive,
> um, muscle mass <G> if a significantly narrower tire would be a good
> idea)
>

If they're cross tires, tread squim will do more than anything to slow
ya down. If the sidewalls aren't skinwall those will slow you down as
well. Width isn't the biggest factor. I'm not an academic, just what
I've picked up from the Classic (TM) r.b.t discussions.

An example, I just replaced the 650g 37mm wide gumwall tires on my
gravity challenged opt-in town bike with 30mm 350g smooth tread
skinwalls--picked up a good 2mph. Dramatic stuff. Sized up on the
fixed gear to 32mm tires, but with similar weight and quality, and the
performance is about the same. Make sense?

Try some of those 28mm Paselas that are cheap enough to compare to
your current rubber, a steal at $13/each:
http://tinyurl.com/6p7dtw

  Reply With Quote



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 02:32 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright © 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001 - 2006 cyclingforums.com