Re: John Bickmore asking for help with a very difficult problem

Tom Kunich

"Scott" <hendricks_scott@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:2a89a30f-955d-457a-8709-7bbcc758fc90@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>
> John, I'm not sure I'm following you. You say you were born on a US
> Army base in the US. But, were you the child of citizens of some
> other country?

If he was born on a US Army base meaning in this country then he is
automatically a US citizen. If he were born of US citizens in any other
country he would be a US citizen.

Scott

On May 1, 2:24*pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> "Scott" <hendricks_sc...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:2a89a30f-955d-457a-8709-7bbcc758fc90@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > John, I'm not sure I'm following you. *You say you were born on a US
> > Army base in the US. *But, were you the child of citizens of some
> > other country?
>
> If he was born on a US Army base meaning in this country then he is
> automatically a US citizen. If he were born of US citizens in any other
> country he would be a US citizen.

Not necessarily. If he were born to parents of another nationality
who were in the US illegally, then he would not necessarily be a
citizen. That particular issue is still in limbo before the courts.

It's probably not relevant, of course, because I'm pretty positive
that John is a US citizen, but that didn't stop you from nitpicking
about it.

The real point of my message, the one you conveniently ignored because
not even you could find something to argue about, was that the
government can't force HIM to leave if HE is a citizen.

Tom Kunich

"Scott" <hendricks_scott@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cbc92e1b-4cbc-4d53-9702-3dd99b4324b3@w74g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> If he were born to parents of another nationality
> who were in the US illegally, then he would not necessarily be a
> citizen. That particular issue is still in limbo before the courts.

Sorry but you are incorrect. Any child born in the USA to legal or illegal
parents is a US citizen by birthright. The case before the courts has to do
with whether or not you can throw the parents out of the country after the
child is born.

> The real point of my message, the one you conveniently ignored because
> not even you could find something to argue about, was that the
> government can't force HIM to leave if HE is a citizen.

And you seem to be unaware that John appears to be saying that he isn't
going to stay here with his wife somewhere else.

Scott

On May 1, 4:20*pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> "Scott" <hendricks_sc...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:cbc92e1b-4cbc-4d53-9702-3dd99b4324b3@w74g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> > *If he were born to parents of another nationality
> > who were in the US illegally, then he would not necessarily be a
> > citizen. *That particular issue is still in limbo before the courts.
>
> Sorry but you are incorrect. Any child born in the USA to legal or illegal
> parents is a US citizen by birthright. The case before the courts has to do
> with whether or not you can throw the parents out of the country after the
> child is born.
>
> > The real point of my message, the one you conveniently ignored because
> > not even you could find something to argue about, was that the
> > government can't force HIM to leave if HE is a citizen.
>
> And you seem to be unaware that John appears to be saying that he isn't
> going to stay here with his wife somewhere else.

No, I didn't miss that point at all.

Tom Kunich

"Scott" <hendricks_scott@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:248419be-f4e5-4cf0-8f9f-d15d2faadc13@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On May 1, 4:20 pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> > And you seem to be unaware that John appears to be saying that he isn't
> > going to stay here with his wife somewhere else.
>
> No, I didn't miss that point at all.

Ahh, then all of that printing suggesting that JOHN doesn't have to go meant
exactly what?