![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 3, 9:03 am, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> Well, what use is a Pro Tour if a large percentage of those competing aren't > at a majority of the races? And if the UCI puts these races all around the > world you can bet that will happen. Say for instance that American racers > race the American Pro Tour race. They probably aren't going to go to China > to race one there. And in all likelihood neither will they go off to Europe. > It will be a local race to most people and the entire idea of a Pro Tour > then loses most of its impact. I'd be willing to bet that a 2.2 race in China provides better in terms of travel expenses and accomodation than an equally ranked race in the US would for a similarly ranked team. And I seem to recall that what the TdQL doesn't provide in terms of accomodation (it really is that bad and even worse for the event staff) they make up for with appearance fees, as well as the nifty factor from racing at 3000m above sea level on the Tibetan plateau. -M |
|