![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If recumbents were allowed in the Tour as well as any other
professional race event, do you think any riders would switch or at least experiment with recumbents? My guess is they might switch for a fairly flat time trial but that's it. I have watched and marveled at the pros as they dance on the pedals while climbing switchbacks so steep I'd be looking for a ladder! Under these conditions, I argue the recumbent cannot compete. Any thoughts? Jim |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 14, 12:02*pm, stratrider <jrei...@enter.net> wrote:
> If recumbents were allowed in the Tour as well as any other > professional race event, do you think any riders would switch or at > least experiment with recumbents? *My guess is they might switch for a > fairly flat time trial but that's it. *I have watched and marveled at > the pros as they dance on the pedals while climbing switchbacks so > steep I'd be looking for a ladder! *Under these conditions, I argue > the recumbent cannot compete. *Any thoughts? > > Jim Cycling's definitely going to evolve. In what ways... I don't know. But, I definitely don't see it going towards recumbents. And, I don't think we'll ever see a day when recumbents are allowed on the Tour. That said, I wonder if there are races involving only recumbents. Has anybody seen one? Cullen |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
<ccarter@new.rr.com> wrote in message news:20c9f867-84ca-4cb2-901f-76611d016ed1@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com... On May 14, 12:02 pm, stratrider <jrei...@enter.net> wrote: > If recumbents were allowed in the Tour as well as any other > professional race event, do you think any riders would switch or at > least experiment with recumbents? My guess is they might switch for a > fairly flat time trial but that's it. I have watched and marveled at > the pros as they dance on the pedals while climbing switchbacks so > steep I'd be looking for a ladder! Under these conditions, I argue > the recumbent cannot compete. Any thoughts? > > Jim >Cycling's definitely going to evolve. In what ways... I don't know. >But, I definitely don't see it going towards recumbents. And, I don't >think we'll ever see a day when recumbents are allowed on the Tour. >That said, I wonder if there are races involving only recumbents. Has >anybody seen one? >Cullen There are lots of recumbent races. The USA has HPRA and there are also IHPVA races in the US and Europe. Since the races are 'human power' any kind of bike can be raced. There is a racer from Michigan who races a Cervalo with a small front fairing and lycra body sock. He's pretty fast, but the general race crowd rides low racers. You could take a look through www.recumbents.com for information and photos of the human powered racers at several different venues over a period of years. gotbent aka frvt rider ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
stratrider wrote:
> If recumbents were allowed in the Tour as well as any other > professional race event, do you think any riders would switch or at > least experiment with recumbents? My guess is they might switch for a > fairly flat time trial but that's it. I have watched and marveled at > the pros as they dance on the pedals while climbing switchbacks so > steep I'd be looking for a ladder! Under these conditions, I argue > the recumbent cannot compete. Any thoughts? On a stage which is a pure climb then weight of the bike will have a more significant beariung and aerodynamics will have less, as the speeds are lower. So on a pure climb you'd probably lose out. But on mixed (not just flat) sections it's not so simple as that... In the 2003 Classique Genevoise there was a recumbent class, and the recumbents took the day (see http://www.m5-ligfietsen.nl/site/EN...ique_Genevoise/). Now, M5's site only talks about the 2003 event, I don't know what happened since then! The UK "End to End" record has been held on a faired recumbent trike for quite a few years now, and that's a *big* route (over 800 miles) with lots of significant climbs, yet still the recumbent holds it. PBP has yet to have a 'bent as the fastest, I think, but the fastest 'bent finshers are up with good times and of course they have far few fewer riders who regularly race. So I think more than flat time trials would see 'bents. And on the track they'd be dynamite! Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/ |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
<ccarter@new.rr.com> wrote
>On May 14, 12:02 pm, stratrider <jrei...@enter.net> wrote: >> If recumbents were allowed in the Tour as well as any other >> professional race event, do you think any riders would switch or at >> least experiment with recumbents? This is a thought experiment, as the TdF would never allow it. My guess is that it would be difficult to convince racers who commit years of training to UCI-specified bike racing to embrace a different design. They simply wouldn't consider it "bicycle racing". That's perfectly understandable. >> My guess is they might switch for a >> fairly flat time trial but that's it. I have watched and marveled at >> the pros as they dance on the pedals while climbing switchbacks so >> steep I'd be looking for a ladder! Spin, spin, spin, to win has been the answer for mountainous stages in recent TdF, hasn't it? >> Under these conditions, I argue >> the recumbent cannot compete. Any thoughts? Oh, the "recumbents can't climb" discussion! %^) Okay, imagine two bikes and riders of the same weight and with the riders having the same power output capability. One bike has a measurable aerodynamic advantage. All other factors being equal, the more aerodynamic bike will be faster, even up hill. The faster the riders, the more difference the aerodynamics will make. So for the less aerodynamic bike rider to win, there needs to be some ergonomic or mechanical advantage to the available riding positions or techniques. Such an advantage is often asserted for upright bike riding position and particularly for climbing. Some possibile advantages offered include: - ability to recruit more or different muscles increases power output - using shifts in body weight offers some mechanical advantage - standing allows resting of some muscles As far as I know, none of these assertions have tested or advanteges quantified in a controlled study. Logic seems to indicate that if any of these or other better upright climbing methods are true, they must come at some expense (higher drag, limited endurance, etc) or the techniques would be used in a sustained fashion. >Cycling's definitely going to evolve. In what ways... I don't know. > >But, I definitely don't see it going towards recumbents. Do you meain bicycle racing or cycling in general? If you mean cycling in general, how about the crank-forward designs,-- that's going "toward" recumbent, isn't it? %^) > And, I don't think we'll ever see a day when > recumbents are allowed on the Tour. No, too much history there. In any case, like with sailing races, there's an element of one-design-class contest for many bicycle races. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-design TdF is not supposed to be about the bike, don't you know? It's about the *pharmaceuticals*! %^) >That said, I wonder if there are races involving only > recumbents. Has anybody seen one? There are a number of open-class races and records where recumbent designs, both faired and unfaired dominate, see IHPVA: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intern...cle_Association http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_Whittingham There are various cycling records which show comparitive performance across bicycle categories. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hour_record It's pretty clear from a "pure speed" perspective that aerodynamics are the limiting factor. Note the distinction within records for upright bikes with "unorthodox positions". Note the curve of the one-hour records plotted for UCI vs. IHPVA. In personal anecdotal "real-world" comparisons, I, a non-racer, overweitght recumbent rider have been able to keep up with younger, fitter upright riders on multi-day self supported tours around Taos, NM, and in hilly southern Oklahoma,-- climbing faster in some cases. Jon |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"stratrider" <jreilly@enter.net> wrote in message news:ba1b6425-2fd5-4178-8eba-f1921abbfa37@m45g2000hsb.googlegroups.com... > If recumbents were allowed in the Tour as well as any other > professional race event, do you think any riders would switch or at > least experiment with recumbents? My guess is they might switch for a > fairly flat time trial but that's it. I have watched and marveled at > the pros as they dance on the pedals while climbing switchbacks so > steep I'd be looking for a ladder! Under these conditions, I argue > the recumbent cannot compete. Any thoughts? > > Jim Some sugar daddy would have to pony up a couple hundred million to build teams to do any major kind of race, and to have enough teams to make it a race. The pros will ride what they're paid to ride as long as their union and league rules allow them to. I think it probable that rider contracts may stipulate branding requirements for equipment. There's a photo bouncing around the net of Jan Ullrich riding a Baron or Jester. His pro days are probably over, but I haven't seen his name mentioned as participating in Euro championships, or him having been hired to be the motor for a world record run in a Battle Mountain speedbike. So basically the whole argument is moot. The TdF is about artificially preserving the classic equipment used in the race and reaping gazillions of Euros in sponsor and ad revenues. I talked to some state champion track racers at the Northbrook track who were watching a couple of NoComs doing hot laps on the track. They were interested in them, but they weren't going to make a career change to beat up on the few geezers who race the HPRA circuit. These are atheletes who compete at a pretty high level and at that level and discipline the competition is is riding fixy track bikes. gotbent, aka frvt rider ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
|