![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Story in a Canadian rag, The Globe and Mail, detailing the difficulties of integrated an uptown brand into a low rent empire. http://tinyurl.com/423pgm |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
There are two types of people-- those who ride cannondale and those
who wish they did! On May 15, 11:34*am, Luke <lucasirag...@rogers.com> wrote: > Story in a Canadian rag, The Globe and Mail, detailing the difficulties > of integrated an uptown brand into a low rent empire. > > http://tinyurl.com/423pgm |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Luke wrote:
> Story in a Canadian rag, The Globe and Mail, detailing the difficulties > of integrated an uptown brand into a low rent empire. > > http://tinyurl.com/423pgm I think that Specialized has no need to be worried, nor does Trek. When was the last time you saw a bicycle store selling Cannondale? |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In article <EB2Xj.4557$nW2.31@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com>,
SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote: > Luke wrote: > > Story in a Canadian rag, The Globe and Mail, detailing the difficulties > > of integrated an uptown brand into a low rent empire. > > > > http://tinyurl.com/423pgm > > I think that Specialized has no need to be worried, nor does Trek. When > was the last time you saw a bicycle store selling Cannondale? Are you serious? Because they have a pretty extensive dealer network. They may not be Trek, but then, who is? -- Ryan Cousineau rcousine@gmail.com http://www.wiredcola.com/ "In other newsgroups, they killfile trolls." "In rec.bicycles.racing, we coach them." |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ryan Cousineau wrote:
> In article <EB2Xj.4557$nW2.31@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com>, > SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote: > > >>Luke wrote: >> >>>Story in a Canadian rag, The Globe and Mail, detailing the difficulties >>>of integrated an uptown brand into a low rent empire. >>> >>>http://tinyurl.com/423pgm >> >>I think that Specialized has no need to be worried, nor does Trek. When >>was the last time you saw a bicycle store selling Cannondale? > > > Are you serious? Because they have a pretty extensive dealer network. > > They may not be Trek, but then, who is? > It probably depends on where you live. I don't remember the last time I saw a Cannondale bike. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ryan Cousineau wrote:
> In article <EB2Xj.4557$nW2.31@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com>, > SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote: > >> Luke wrote: >>> Story in a Canadian rag, The Globe and Mail, detailing the difficulties >>> of integrated an uptown brand into a low rent empire. >>> >>> http://tinyurl.com/423pgm >> I think that Specialized has no need to be worried, nor does Trek. When >> was the last time you saw a bicycle store selling Cannondale? > > Are you serious? Because they have a pretty extensive dealer network. Perhaps, but all the top tier stores seem to have dropped them. I tried using their "Dealer Locator" on their web site, and I see that REI carries them, as well as some second tier shops. I was at a bicycle shop yesterday, talking to them about some marketing of one of their niche product lines, and the owner was talking to me about the lines of bicycles he carries. He carries Trek, Raleigh, Electra, and Diamondback. Trek is no more expensive (wholesale) that the other top brands like Cannondale or Specialized, and sells much better. Trek's periodic dealer promotions aren't as good as the other lines, they'll sometimes offer 25-30% off the regular wholesale price to clear out excess inventory, which is less than the other brands offer, and it's more limited (certain sizes and colors of certain models). In any case, it's Trek sales, and accessory sales that are keeping the shop going. Trek is not selling other lines of products into department stores, or even chains like REI. The dealers still remember Specialized's ill-fated foray into chain stores with the "Full Force" brand. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
SMS wrote:
> > Trek is not selling other lines of products into department stores, or > even chains like REI. The dealers still remember Specialized's ill-fated > foray into chain stores with the "Full Force" brand. An LBS employee told me that Bell had bought Giro (I didn't know that) and now that Giro helmets are in places like Copeland's (chain sporting goods) the LBS wouldn't be carrying Giro any more. It was just a pricing issue though I think... he said that Copeland's just has a lower overhead and markup so he had to carry something that the cheaper retailers couldn't offer. Nothing to do with diluting the brand. So now he carries Specialized helmets along with Trek. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
SMS wrote:
> Perhaps, but all the top tier stores seem to have dropped them. What top tier stores are you talking about? > I tried using their "Dealer Locator" on their web site, and I see that > REI carries them, as well as some second tier shops. How do you know which LBSes qualify as top and second tier stores? The way you phrased all this, you really seem to be talking out of your ass. Seven out of the eight shops that deal with Cannondale in the Atlanta are quality LBSes, from what I gather. \\paul -- Paul M. Hobson ..:change the f to ph to reply:. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
>> Trek is not selling other lines of products into department stores, or
>> even chains like REI. The dealers still remember Specialized's ill-fated >> foray into chain stores with the "Full Force" brand. > > An LBS employee told me that Bell had bought Giro (I didn't know that) and > now that Giro helmets are in places like Copeland's (chain sporting goods) > the LBS wouldn't be carrying Giro any more. It was just a pricing issue > though I think... he said that Copeland's just has a lower overhead and > markup so he had to carry something that the cheaper retailers couldn't > offer. Nothing to do with diluting the brand. So now he carries > Specialized helmets along with Trek. The issue isn't lower overhead for the big guys vs the LBS. The issue is that, if Bellsports or whomever wants to hit their numbers at the end of the month, they give a call to the big mail order houses offering them incentives to bring in a ton of product. That's standard industry practice with a lot of the players. It's not a level playing field; the big guys have some huge advantages over the LBS. That's one of the reasons shops support Trek so well. Trek doesn't play games like that; if they overproduce something, it's offered to all of their dealers at the reduced price. Everybody has the same rules. To be competitive without having lots of slash & burn sales, they have to make sure they've got a good product at a reasonable price, and they generally do pretty well in that regard. Unfortunately, Trek can make exceptional bikes, but they don't quite have the high-end helmet thing down. Giro is king there, with the best-in-class style & graphics around. It's not about quality per se; the $39.99 Trek Vapor is the "killer app" of helmets. But Giro somehow manages to make hard foam with a thin plastic shell actually look like something someone would pay $200+ for. --Mike Jacoubowsky Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReaction.com Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
catzz66 wrote:
> Ryan Cousineau wrote: > >> In article <EB2Xj.4557$nW2.31@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com>, >> SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> Luke wrote: >>> >>>> Story in a Canadian rag, The Globe and Mail, detailing the difficulties >>>> of integrated an uptown brand into a low rent empire. >>>> >>>> http://tinyurl.com/423pgm >>> >>> >>> I think that Specialized has no need to be worried, nor does Trek. >>> When was the last time you saw a bicycle store selling Cannondale? >> >> >> >> Are you serious? Because they have a pretty extensive dealer network. >> >> They may not be Trek, but then, who is? >> > > It probably depends on where you live. I don't remember the last time I > saw a Cannondale bike. (looks around) about 5 seconds ago... might not be the *greatest* bike on earth, but for a Craigslist buy, it's pretty spiffy. Would have had to pay at least 2-3x as much for anything comparable from a LBS... nate -- replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply. http://members.cox.net/njnagel |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On May 16, 8:38 pm, "Mike Jacoubowsky" <Mi...@ChainReaction.com>
wrote: > [about Trek & Cannondale] > > It's not a level playing field; the big guys have some huge advantages over > the LBS. That's one of the reasons shops support Trek so well. Trek doesn't > play games like that; if they overproduce something, it's offered to all of > their dealers at the reduced price. Everybody has the same rules. To be > competitive without having lots of slash & burn sales, they have to make > sure they've got a good product at a reasonable price, and they generally do > pretty well in that regard. I'd think Trek's higher popularity also has something to do with Lance winning seven Tours on them. If he'd ridden Cannondale, he'd have been just as fast, I'm sure, and Cannondale's sales would be much higher. That's why Nike pays millions and millions to get Tiger Woods, Michael Jordan, LeBron James, etc. under their wing. Lots of consumers aren't very bright; they're easily influenced by those tactics. > > Unfortunately, Trek can make exceptional bikes, but they don't quite have > the high-end helmet thing down. Giro is king there, with the best-in-class > style & graphics around. It's not about quality per se; the $39.99 Trek > Vapor is the "killer app" of helmets. But Giro somehow manages to make hard > foam with a thin plastic shell actually look like something someone would > pay $200+ for. Hmm. As I said, lots of consumers aren't very bright; they're easily influenced by those tactics. - Frank Krygowski |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Mike Jacoubowsky wrote:
> Unfortunately, Trek can make exceptional bikes, but they don't quite have > the high-end helmet thing down. Giro is king there, with the best-in-class > style & graphics around. It's not about quality per se; the $39.99 Trek > Vapor is the "killer app" of helmets. But Giro somehow manages to make hard > foam with a thin plastic shell actually look like something someone would > pay $200+ for. Taking this on a tangent, I see that the Vapor is only available on one universal size. (I'm actually thinking I ought to get a new helmet, and if I could get a good one for 40 bucks that'd be even better.) I guess I just ASSumed that a helmet should be fitted to one's dome. It appears Trek doesn't agree. Who's right? nate -- replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply. http://members.cox.net/njnagel |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Nate Nagel" <njnagel@roosters.net> wrote in message
news:g0lg0n0pdh@news2.newsguy.com... | Mike Jacoubowsky wrote: | | > Unfortunately, Trek can make exceptional bikes, but they don't quite have | > the high-end helmet thing down. Giro is king there, with the best-in-class | > style & graphics around. It's not about quality per se; the $39.99 Trek | > Vapor is the "killer app" of helmets. But Giro somehow manages to make hard | > foam with a thin plastic shell actually look like something someone would | > pay $200+ for. | | Taking this on a tangent, I see that the Vapor is only available on one | universal size. (I'm actually thinking I ought to get a new helmet, and | if I could get a good one for 40 bucks that'd be even better.) I guess | I just ASSumed that a helmet should be fitted to one's dome. It appears | Trek doesn't agree. Who's right? | | nate Nate: We resisted the move to a single-size helmet with everything we had, but in the end, it doesn't seem to have been such a bad thing. It's not actually just a one-size offering, since they also have smaller shells for both youth and women. They did drop a bit off the large end of folk that it might fit though. Best bet is to simply try one on and see. Do keep in mind that, while fitting a helmet isn't difficult, it still needs to be done. Not much to it; adjust the straps so they come together just under the ears, and turn the knob at the back to loosen or tighten. It will either fit comfortably or not. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Paul M. Hobson" <fobson@gatech.edu> wrote in message news:g0l89e$bcs$1@news-int2.gatech.edu... | SMS wrote: | > Perhaps, but all the top tier stores seem to have dropped them. | | What top tier stores are you talking about? | | > I tried using their "Dealer Locator" on their web site, and I see that | > REI carries them, as well as some second tier shops. | | How do you know which LBSes qualify as top and second tier stores? The | way you phrased all this, you really seem to be talking out of your ass. | Seven out of the eight shops that deal with Cannondale in the Atlanta | are quality LBSes, from what I gather. The quality of shops for a given brand in a given area is going to be hugely dependent upon the quality and long-term thinking of the local rep. Bicycle companies with a high churn rate for reps are going to choose quick fixes to their distribution issues (primarily selling more bikes!) rather than make short-term sacrifices that will pay dividends down the road. This is one area that Trek probably has it hands-down over the rest of the brands, because there's an inherent stability within the organization that breeds long-term loyalties. Reps tend to stay far longer than at most companies, and management? Pretty much the same group of people for the past 20 years. Trek is also highly unusual among the major players because they don't require that dealers put in huge pre-season orders... for bike or parts. We can order what we want, when we want it. The company actually discourages dealers carrying too much inventory, because inventory sitting in boxes is costing the dealer money. Money needs to "work" which means it needs to "turn" (a "turn" represents how many times a given unit on the floor will sell in a given year, so if always have two of something in stock and you sell twelve in a year, you're getting six "turns" on the product). Trek believes that a more-profitable dealer is going to invest more in their business and their community (community investment=bicycle advocacy). Both of those grow sales for bikes in general and Trek in particular. Not every dealer is up for it though; what Trek expects, in return for dealers not having to carry huge inventories at times of the year it doesn't sell, is a large percentage of the dealer's business. Many of us "drink the kool-aid" and buy into it, and many resist. Ultimately, the major brands (the Big 3, which would be Specialized, Giant & Trek) all have the same ideal store in mind- a store that carries only their brand (of the Big 3) and purchases 70%+ of their bike inventory from them. Can you be a "top tier" store without carrying one of the Big 3? Yes. Is it easy? No. Most other brands lack year-to-year consistency, making it difficult to assume that you won't have concerns about supplies and even product quality from one year to the next. And if a store is into cherry-picking from a whole lot of lines, there's no way they're going to get anywhere near the quality of warranty effort & resolution as a store that has more loyalty to a particular company. This has strayed quite a ways from the original question. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Mike Jacoubowsky wrote: [stuff I snipped, but which was pretty good]
I'm surprised nobody's mentioned Mongoose here, which is another Pacific/Dorel brand. They've tried to sell at both ends of the market with the same brand, which is confusing -- and I wouldn't guess works well at the high end of the spectrum. Starting a brand high and then moving mass market is a classic marketing strategy which I've seen in hair products [the high end stuff starts out in salons with the secret-ingredient-of-the-year then moves into supermarkets and drug stores -- older examples include Jhirmack and Jerri Redding products], womens foundation garments [new brands start out in Nordstroms, etc. and eventually move to discount stores], luggage [Samsonite used to be a high end only brand, long ago], etc. And, of course, there's consumer electronics. This can work out well for all concerned -- even the salons, specialty stores and other high end places -- if there's a new product pipeline once the original brand moves downmarket. So, when herbal shampoo moved out of salons into grocery, there was aloe to replace it. But if there's not an adequate pipeline, the high end shops get hosed. In essence, this is what happened to all those Schwinn shops, although that story is much more complicated to summarize so simply. Now Schwinn is just the "better" brand at Wal-mart. [You can still get a top quality bike made by a Schwinn, but it will have a "Waterford" decal.] Shimano is really on the ball here. Shimano stands for a "quality" drivetrain at all levels. At the high end it stands for "more quality". If they make cheap junk, they at least don't put their own name on it. This multiple positioning is probably easier for a component maker [like Shimano or Intel]. -- Mike Kruger "You have to be careful if you are reckless." - Richard M. Daley |
|