![]() |
View
New Forum Topics Today's Forum Topics Set as homepage |
|
|||||||
| |
||||
Welcome to CyclingForums.com You are currently viewing our website as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions. You will have to register before you can post to this thread. By joining our free online community you will have access to post new topics, communicate privately with other cyclingforums.com members (PM), respond to polls, upload photos and access other special features like product reviews and classifieds. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I've just had a look at this month's and it reminds me of the barrier
at the Kingussie end of the section of NCN between Kingussie and Newtonmore. http://homepage.ntlworld.com/pete.m...month/index.htm In both cases the barrier prevents you from riding onto the path from the road. -- Phil Cook looking north over the park to the "Westminster Gasworks" |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Phil Cook wrote:
> I've just had a look at this month's and it reminds me of the barrier > at the Kingussie end of the section of NCN between Kingussie and > Newtonmore. > > http://homepage.ntlworld.com/pete.m...month/index.htm > > In both cases the barrier prevents you from riding onto the path from > the road. Ooh, i've got a brilliant one on my camera, must send it in soon. It's part of a two-way segregated cycle lane, and looks a bit like this (where = is a kerb and - is a painted line): pavement =============================== -> <- ---------- ========== <- -> ==========--------------------- road Yes, it changes from ride-on-the-left to ride-on-the right, and sends two opposing streams of traffic directly across one another. There is a yield mark on one of them, so it sort of works in principle, but i can't see it doing so in practice. tom -- 20 Minutes into the Future |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Phil Cook" <phil@p-t-cook.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:c83d44p6o619h4e92a7u7plouc9jffk1fp@4ax.com... > I've just had a look at this month's and it reminds me of the barrier > at the Kingussie end of the section of NCN between Kingussie and > Newtonmore. > > http://homepage.ntlworld.com/pete.m...month/index.htm > > In both cases the barrier prevents you from riding onto the path from > the road. FFS, do the designers of these monstrosities have anything more than an amoeba for a brain?!! AAAARRGGGGHH!! Rant over. Normal service will now be resumed. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
wafflycat wrote:
> FFS, do the designers of these monstrosities have anything more than an > amoeba for a brain?!! AAAARRGGGGHH!! > > Rant over. Normal service will now be resumed. not until after the legal branch of the Association for the Advancement of Amoebae has sued you for defamation, it won't... Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/ |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Jun 4, 7:51*am, Phil Cook <p...@p-t-cook.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> I've just had a look at this month's and it reminds me of the barrier > at the Kingussie end of the section of NCN between Kingussie and > Newtonmore. > > http://homepage.ntlworld.com/pete.m...the-month/index... > > In both cases the barrier prevents you from riding onto the path from > the road. > -- > Phil Cook looking north over the park to the "Westminster Gasworks" It's an obvious attempt to inject 'xtreme' into urban cycling, when out riding your BMX you can now hop up onto the rail, grind and continue, sweet! |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Peter Clinch" <p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk> wrote in message news:6ano3tF2qd9qoU2@mid.individual.net... > wafflycat wrote: > >> FFS, do the designers of these monstrosities have anything more than an >> amoeba for a brain?!! AAAARRGGGGHH!! >> >> Rant over. Normal service will now be resumed. > > not until after the legal branch of the Association for the Advancement > of Amoebae has sued you for defamation, it won't... > > Pete. Darn... they got me bang to rights! :-) |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:36:50 +0100 someone who may be "wafflycat"
<w*a*ff£y£cat*@£btco*nn£ect.com> wrote this:- >FFS, do the designers of these monstrosities have anything more than an >amoeba for a brain?!! AAAARRGGGGHH!! They have a brain? When was this novel idea introduced and who is responsible for it? -- David Hansen, Edinburgh I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54 |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Marz wrote:
> On Jun 4, 7:51 am, Phil Cook <p...@p-t-cook.freeserve.co.uk> wrote: >> I've just had a look at this month's and it reminds me of the barrier >> at the Kingussie end of the section of NCN between Kingussie and >> Newtonmore. >> >> http://homepage.ntlworld.com/pete.m...the-month/index... >> >> In both cases the barrier prevents you from riding onto the path from >> the road. >> -- >> Phil Cook looking north over the park to the "Westminster Gasworks" > > It's an obvious attempt to inject 'xtreme' into urban cycling, when > out riding your BMX you can now hop up onto the rail, grind and > continue, sweet! Continue for 10 yards until you have to stop and the give way ( just visible at the top), just how much use do they think this bit of white paint lunacy will get? |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:53:42 +0100, Tom Anderson wrote:
> Yes, it changes from ride-on-the-left to ride-on-the right, and sends two > opposing streams of traffic directly across one another. There is a > yield mark on one of them, so it sort of works in principle, but i can't > see it doing so in practice. If you enjoy this then come for a ride around Wrexham some time - scalextric style crossovers on shared use paths (i.e. swapping the pedestrian and the cyclists' sides) seem to be the speciality around here. One farcility has 3 of them in about 400m. Must take a photo of it and send it in.... peter |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On 04/06/2008 15:36, wafflycat wrote:
> Rant over. Normal service will now be resumed. I thought that was normal service :-P -- Danny Colyer <http://www.redpedals.co.uk> Reply address is valid, but that on my website is checked more often "The plural of anecdote is not data" - Frank Kotsonis |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Danny Colyer" <danny_colyer@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:RdidnUfb-9iXSNvVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@posted.plusnet... > On 04/06/2008 15:36, wafflycat wrote: >> Rant over. Normal service will now be resumed. > > I thought that was normal service :-P > Oi! Nipples! Watch it! ;-) |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:51:14 +0100, Phil Cook
<phil@p-t-cook.freeserve.co.uk> wrote: >I've just had a look at this month's and it reminds me of the barrier >at the Kingussie end of the section of NCN between Kingussie and >Newtonmore. > >http://homepage.ntlworld.com/pete.m...month/index.htm > >In both cases the barrier prevents you from riding onto the path from >the road. And after bunny-hopping over the fence, see how far you get before the first giveway sign. Pete |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tom Anderson wrote: > On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Phil Cook wrote: > >> I've just had a look at this month's and it reminds me of the barrier >> at the Kingussie end of the section of NCN between Kingussie and >> Newtonmore. >> >> http://homepage.ntlworld.com/pete.m...month/index.htm That is a classic. The council went to the expense of dropping the kerb, then placed the barrier exactly in the middle. What is really worrying is that whenever I see a new FotM, I am nearly always reminded of a similar farcility near me. >> In both cases the barrier prevents you from riding onto the path from >> the road. > > Ooh, i've got a brilliant one on my camera, must send it in soon. It's > part of a two-way segregated cycle lane, and looks a bit like this > (where = is a kerb and - is a painted line): > > pavement > =============================== > -> <- > ---------- ========== > <- -> > ==========--------------------- > road > > Yes, it changes from ride-on-the-left to ride-on-the right, and sends > two opposing streams of traffic directly across one another. There is a > yield mark on one of them, so it sort of works in principle, but i can't > see it doing so in practice. There is a shared use path near me where the cyclist half jumps from the left side, to the right in a short distance, right on a blind corner. Martin. |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In news:X%C1k.146043$cZ3.12235@newsfe10.ams2,
Martin <martin.dann@virgin.net> tweaked the Babbage-Engine to tell us: > There is a shared use path near me where the cyclist half jumps from > the left side, to the right in a short distance, right on a blind > corner. The one along the east side of the Tottenham one-way system does this, with the added bonus of doing so at the entrance to one of the industrial units. Thus one has to look out not only for errant peds and cyclists, but also for vehicles entering and exiting said industrial unit. Not to mention having to dodge round the plodmobiles frequently parked smack in the middle of the path while the filth nick people for driving in the bus lane. -- Dave Larrington <http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk> Although the hippopotamus hath no sting in its tail, the wise man would rather be seated upon the back of a bee. |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 12:14:52 -0500, naked_draughtsman
<usenet3@petereverett.co.uk> wrote: >On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:53:42 +0100, Tom Anderson wrote: > >> Yes, it changes from ride-on-the-left to ride-on-the right, and sends two >> opposing streams of traffic directly across one another. There is a >> yield mark on one of them, so it sort of works in principle, but i can't >> see it doing so in practice. > >If you enjoy this then come for a ride around Wrexham some time - >scalextric style crossovers on shared use paths (i.e. swapping the >pedestrian and the cyclists' sides) seem to be the speciality around here. > >One farcility has 3 of them in about 400m. Must take a photo of it and >send it in.... There's a few "facilities" around here I could submit to FotM -- no, I tell a lie, it's all of them. -- (\__/) M. (='.'=) Owing to the amount of spam posted via googlegroups and (")_(") their inaction to the problem. I am blocking most articles posted from there. If you wish your postings to be seen by everyone you will need use a different method of posting. See http://improve-usenet.org |
|